Department of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry & Pharmacy, Sofia University, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria.
Department of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry & Pharmacy, Sofia University, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2016 Jul;233:223-239. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
Here, we review the principle and applications of two recently developed methods: the capillary meniscus dynamometry (CMD) for measuring the surface tension of bubbles/drops, and the capillary bridge dynamometry (CBD) for quantifying the bubble/drop adhesion to solid surfaces. Both methods are based on a new data analysis protocol, which allows one to decouple the two components of non-isotropic surface tension. For an axisymmetric non-fluid interface (e.g. bubble or drop covered by a protein adsorption layer with shear elasticity), the CMD determines the two different components of the anisotropic surface tension, σs and σφ, which are acting along the "meridians" and "parallels", and vary throughout the interface. The method uses data for the instantaneous bubble (drop) profile and capillary pressure, but the procedure for data processing is essentially different from that of the conventional drop shape analysis (DSA) method. In the case of bubble or drop pressed against a substrate, which forms a capillary bridge, the CBD method allows one to determine also the capillary-bridge force for both isotropic (fluid) and anisotropic (solidified) adsorption layers. The experiments on bubble (drop) detachment from the substrate show the existence of a maximal pulling force, Fmax, that can be resisted by an adherent fluid particle. Fmax can be used to quantify the strength of adhesion of bubbles and drops to solid surfaces. Its value is determined by a competition of attractive transversal tension and repulsive disjoining pressure forces. The greatest Fmax values have been measured for bubbles adherent to glass substrates in pea-protein solutions. The bubble/wall adhesion is lower in solutions containing the protein HFBII hydrophobin, which could be explained with the effect of sandwiched protein aggregates. The applicability of the CBD method to emulsion systems is illustrated by experiments with soybean-oil drops adherent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates in egg yolk solutions. The results reveal how the interfacial rigidity, as well as the bubble/wall and drop/wall adhesion forces, can be quantified and controlled in relation to optimizing the properties of foams and emulsions.
在这里,我们回顾了两种最近开发的方法的原理和应用:用于测量气泡/液滴表面张力的毛细管束力法(CMD),以及用于量化气泡/液滴与固体表面附着的毛细桥力法(CBD)。这两种方法都基于一种新的数据分析协议,该协议允许人们分离非各向同性表面张力的两个分量。对于轴对称非流体界面(例如,被蛋白质吸附层覆盖的气泡或液滴,该吸附层具有剪切弹性),CMD 确定各向异性表面张力的两个不同分量,σs和σφ,它们沿着“子午线”和“平行”起作用,并在整个界面上变化。该方法使用即时气泡(液滴)轮廓和毛细压力数据,但数据处理过程与传统的液滴形状分析(DSA)方法基本不同。在气泡或液滴压在形成毛细桥的基底上的情况下,CBD 方法还允许确定各向同性(流体)和各向异性(固化)吸附层的毛细桥力。从基底上脱离的气泡(液滴)实验表明,存在最大拉力 Fmax,可抵抗附着的流体颗粒。Fmax 可用于量化气泡和液滴对固体表面的附着强度。其值取决于横向吸引力张力和排斥离隙压力的竞争。在豌豆蛋白溶液中,粘附在玻璃基底上的气泡的 Fmax 值最大。在含有蛋白质 HFBII 疏水蛋白的溶液中,气泡与基底的附着性较低,这可以用夹在中间的蛋白质聚集体的作用来解释。CBD 方法在乳液体系中的适用性通过在蛋黄溶液中粘附于亲水和疏水基底的大豆油液滴的实验得到了说明。结果揭示了如何量化和控制界面刚性以及气泡/壁和液滴/壁附着力,以优化泡沫和乳液的性能。