Kendrick Daniel E, Gosling Andre F, Nagavalli Anil, Kashyap Vikram S, Wang John C
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals-Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University Hospitals-Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):1158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
Endovascular interventions such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) have largely replaced invasive open procedures, and have been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients. Our study used endovascular simulation to assess the effect of TEVAR rehearsal on surgical trainees at different levels in training.
Participants were oriented on an endovascular simulator and subsequently a simulated TEVAR was performed during 4 separate sessions over a 1-month period. Metrics included total procedure/fluoroscopy time and volume of contrast used. Likert scale qualitative analysis evaluated participant׳s skills involving major procedural steps. Analysis of data across cohorts included 1-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-tests.
All data were collected at University Hospitals-Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
In all, 12 trainees in 3 cohorts (student, surgery resident postgraduate year [PGY] 1-3, surgery resident/fellow PGY 4-7, n = 4 each) were recruited.
All trainees reduced total procedure time (mean = 537 ± 148 vs 269 ± 66s, first session vs fourth, P < 0.05, CI: 195-341) and fluoroscopy time (mean = 201 ± 74 vs 110 ± 37s, P < 0.05, CI: 51-132) with TEVAR case progression. The student cohort decreased procedure time from 551 ± 84s to 313 ± 65s (P < 0.05, CI: 189-287) whereas PGYs 1 to 3 decreased procedure time from 591 ± 149s to 264 ± 29s (P < 0.05, CI: 113-541). Use of contrast decreased over time, but the difference was not significant. Participants acquired proficiency after a few runs in most steps of the procedure. The average qualitative score for all groups combined improved significantly (P < 0.03). PGY 4 to 7 trainees had higher technical scores but this was not statistically significant. The initial gap in junior vs senior trainee performance narrowed after a few practice sessions in all aspects evaluated.
TEVAR rehearsal on an endovascular simulator can reduce overall procedure and fluoroscopy time, independent of trainee skill level or experience, as well as improve subjective measures of technical success. Further studies are needed to compare simulator performance to outcomes in live cases.
血管内介入治疗,如胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR),已在很大程度上取代了侵入性开放手术,并已被证明在治疗患者方面是有效的。我们的研究使用血管内模拟来评估TEVAR预演对不同培训水平的外科实习生的影响。
参与者在血管内模拟器上接受培训,随后在1个月的时间内分4个独立阶段进行模拟TEVAR操作。指标包括总操作时间/透视时间以及造影剂用量。李克特量表定性分析评估了参与者在主要操作步骤中的技能。跨队列数据分析包括单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和配对t检验。
所有数据均在俄亥俄州克利夫兰市大学医院凯斯医疗中心收集。
共招募了3个队列中的12名实习生(学生、住院医师第1 - 3年、住院医师/研究员第4 - 7年,各4名)。
随着TEVAR病例进展,所有实习生的总操作时间(首次操作时平均为537 ± 148秒,第四次操作时为269 ± 66秒,P < 0.05,CI:195 - 341)和透视时间(平均为201 ± 74秒,第四次操作时为110 ± 37秒,P < 0.05,CI:51 - 132)均有所减少。学生队列的操作时间从551 ± 84秒降至313 ± 65秒(P < 0.05,CI:189 - 287),而第1至3年住院医师的操作时间从591 ± 149秒降至264 ± 29秒(P < 0.05,CI:113 - 541)。造影剂用量随时间减少,但差异不显著。参与者在该操作的大多数步骤中经过几次练习后达到了熟练程度。所有组综合的平均定性评分显著提高(P < 0.03)。第4至7年住院医师的技术评分较高,但无统计学意义。在所有评估方面,经过几次练习后,初级与高级实习生表现的初始差距缩小。
在血管内模拟器上进行TEVAR预演可减少总体操作时间和透视时间,与实习生的技能水平或经验无关,还能改善技术成功的主观指标。需要进一步研究将模拟器表现与实际病例结果进行比较。