Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier du Dr. Schaffner de Lens, France
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier du Dr. Schaffner de Lens, France.
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):449-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev222. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
Dynamic indices, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), are inaccurate predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume. This study aimed to test whether changes in continuous cardiac index (CCI), PPV, and stroke volume variation (SVV) after a mini-fluid challenge (100 ml of fluid during 1 min) could predict fluid responsiveness in these patients.
We prospectively studied 49 critically ill, deeply sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients (tidal volume <8 ml kg(-1) of ideal body weight) without cardiac arrhythmias, in whom a fluid challenge was indicated because of circulatory failure. The CCI, SVV (PiCCO™; Pulsion), and PPV (MP70™; Philips) were measured before and after 100 ml of colloid infusion during 1 min, and then after the additional infusion of 400 ml during 14 min. Responders were defined as subjects with a ≥15% increase in cardiac index (transpulmonary thermodilution) after the full (500 ml) fluid challenge. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the grey zones were determined for changes in CCI (ΔCCI100), SVV (ΔSVV100), and PPV (ΔPPV100) after 100 ml fluid challenge.
Twenty-two subjects were responders. The ΔCCI100 predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUC of 0.78. The grey zone was large and included 67% of subjects. The ΔSVV100 and ΔPPV100 predicted fluid responsiveness with AUCs of 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. Grey zones were small, including ≤12% of subjects for both indices.
The ΔSVV100 and ΔPPV100 predict fluid responsiveness accurately and better than ΔCCI100 (PiCCO™; Pulsion) in patients with circulatory failure and ventilated with low volumes.
在接受低潮气量机械通气的患者中,脉压变异(PPV)等动态指标预测液体反应性的准确性较差。本研究旨在检验在这些患者中,1 分钟内输注 100ml 液体后的连续心排量指数(CCI)、PPV 和每搏量变异(SVV)变化能否预测液体反应性。
我们前瞻性研究了 49 名患有重症疾病、深度镇静和机械通气的患者(潮气量<8ml/kg 理想体重),这些患者没有心律失常,由于循环衰竭需要进行液体冲击试验。在 1 分钟内输注 100ml 胶体前后测量 CCI、SVV(PiCCO™;Pulsion)和 PPV(MP70™;飞利浦),然后在 14 分钟内再输注 400ml。以心脏指数(经肺温度稀释法)在 500ml 全容量液体冲击试验后增加≥15%为有反应者。确定 CCI(ΔCCI100)、SVV(ΔSVV100)和 PPV(ΔPPV100)在 100ml 液体冲击试验后的曲线下面积(AUCs)和灰色区域。
22 名患者为有反应者。ΔCCI100 预测液体反应性的 AUC 为 0.78。灰色区域较大,包含 67%的患者。ΔSVV100 和 ΔPPV100 预测液体反应性的 AUC 分别为 0.91 和 0.92。两个指数的灰色区域均较小,包含≤12%的患者。
在接受低潮气量机械通气且循环衰竭的患者中,ΔSVV100 和 ΔPPV100 比 ΔCCI100(PiCCO™;Pulsion)更准确地预测液体反应性。