RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and.
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):e448-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3889. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
No recommendation exists for or against routine use of brief, formal screening instruments in primary care to detect speech and language delay in children through 5 years of age. This review aimed to update the evidence on screening and treating children for speech and language since the 2006 US Preventive Services Task Force systematic review.
Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists. We included studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of screening tools and randomized controlled trials reporting benefits and harms of treatment of speech and language. Two independent reviewers extracted data, checked accuracy, and assigned quality ratings using predefined criteria.
We found no evidence for the impact of screening on speech and language outcomes. In 23 studies evaluating the accuracy of screening tools, sensitivity ranged between 50% and 94%, and specificity ranged between 45% and 96%. Twelve treatment studies improved various outcomes in language, articulation, and stuttering; little evidence emerged for interventions improving other outcomes or for adverse effects of treatment. Risk factors associated with speech and language delay were male gender, family history, and low parental education. A limitation of this review is the lack of well-designed, well-conducted studies addressing whether screening for speech and language delay or disorders improves outcomes.
Several screening tools can accurately identify children for diagnostic evaluations and interventions, but evidence is inadequate regarding applicability in primary care settings. Some treatments for young children identified with speech and language delays and disorders may be effective.
目前,尚无推荐意见建议或反对在初级保健中常规使用简短的正式筛查工具来检测 5 岁以下儿童的言语和语言迟缓。本综述旨在更新自 2006 年美国预防服务工作组系统评价以来,关于筛查和治疗儿童言语和语言障碍的证据。
我们检索了 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、PsycInfo、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、ClinicalTrials.gov 和参考文献列表。我们纳入了报告筛查工具诊断准确性的研究,以及报告治疗言语和语言益处和危害的随机对照试验。两位独立的审查员提取数据、检查准确性,并使用预先确定的标准分配质量等级。
我们没有发现筛查对言语和语言结局有影响的证据。在 23 项评估筛查工具准确性的研究中,敏感性范围在 50%至 94%之间,特异性范围在 45%至 96%之间。12 项治疗研究改善了语言、发音和口吃等方面的各种结局;几乎没有证据表明干预措施能改善其他结局或治疗的不良反应。与言语和语言迟缓相关的风险因素包括男性性别、家族史和父母受教育程度低。本综述的一个局限性是缺乏设计良好、实施良好的研究,以确定筛查言语和语言迟缓或障碍是否能改善结局。
一些筛查工具可以准确识别出需要进行诊断评估和干预的儿童,但在初级保健环境中应用的证据不足。一些针对有言语和语言迟缓障碍的幼儿的治疗方法可能有效。