Li Jing, Guo Zheng, Wang Zhen, Fan Hongbin, Fu Jun
The Orthopaedic Department, Xijing Hospital Affiliated to the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, People's Republic of China,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3204-11. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4447-y. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
Joint-sparing surgery of a patient's native joint for osteosarcoma likely affords better function and comparable survival. However, it sometimes is challenging to resect a juxtaarticular osteosarcoma in a way that preserves the affected epiphysis because wide margins are necessary to minimize the risk of local recurrence. If there was a method to resect a tumor close to the joint and treat a potentially positive margin to prevent recurrence, it might allow salvage of a joint that otherwise might be lost.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked (1) whether joint-preserving tumor resection could be performed for juxtaarticular osteosarcoma after microwave ablation of the tumor edge under navigation without leading to local recurrences, (2) what is the resulting function, and (3) what are the complications associated with this procedure.
Between 2009 and 2011, we treated 11 patients who had juxtaarticular osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia (mean age, 12 years; range, 9-16 years) with joint-preserving surgery by transepiphysis tumor resection after navigation-assisted microwave ablation of the tumor edge; they were followed a minimum of 37 months (mean, 48 months; range 37-62 months), and none was lost to followup. Patients were considered eligible for this procedure if they had a distance from the tumor edge to the articular surface between 10 to 15 mm, good chemotherapy responses, no pathologic fracture and no tumor involvement of major neurovascular structures. Allograft in combination with a vascularized fibula flap was used for segmental reconstruction. We recorded local tumor control, complications, and functional outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better function.
There were no local recurrences. Major complications included osteonecrosis of part of the epiphysis in two patients and deep infection in one. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score ranged from 26 to 30 with a mean of 29.
In selected patients with osteosarcoma invading the epiphysis, navigated resection facilitates performing joint-sparing surgery, and in our small series, the adjuvant microwave ablation seemed to provide adequate local tumor control. Although more experience and longer followup are needed, this approach may make it possible to salvage more native joints when performing limb salvage for osteosarcoma.
Level IV, therapeutic study.
对骨肉瘤患者的原关节进行保关节手术可能会带来更好的功能和相当的生存率。然而,以保留受影响骨骺的方式切除关节周围骨肉瘤有时具有挑战性,因为需要广泛的切缘以将局部复发风险降至最低。如果有一种方法可以在靠近关节处切除肿瘤并处理可能阳性的切缘以防止复发,那么或许可以挽救原本可能会失去的关节。
问题/目的:因此,我们探讨了(1)在导航引导下对肿瘤边缘进行微波消融后,能否对关节周围骨肉瘤进行保关节肿瘤切除而不导致局部复发,(2)术后功能如何,以及(3)该手术相关的并发症有哪些。
2009年至2011年期间,我们对11例胫骨近端关节周围骨肉瘤患者(平均年龄12岁,范围9 - 16岁)采用导航辅助微波消融肿瘤边缘后经骨骺肿瘤切除的保关节手术进行治疗;对他们进行了至少37个月(平均48个月,范围37 - 62个月)的随访,无一例失访。如果患者肿瘤边缘到关节面的距离在10至15毫米之间、化疗反应良好、无病理性骨折且主要神经血管结构无肿瘤侵犯,则被认为适合该手术。采用同种异体骨联合带血管腓骨瓣进行节段性重建。我们使用肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分记录局部肿瘤控制情况、并发症和功能结果,该评分范围为0至30分,分数越高表明功能越好。
无局部复发。主要并发症包括2例患者部分骨骺骨坏死和1例深部感染。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分范围为26至30分,平均分为29分。
对于选定的侵犯骨骺的骨肉瘤患者,导航切除有助于进行保关节手术,在我们的小样本系列研究中,辅助性微波消融似乎能提供充分的局部肿瘤控制。尽管需要更多经验和更长时间的随访,但这种方法可能使在骨肉瘤保肢手术中挽救更多原关节成为可能。
四级,治疗性研究。