• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3个月模拟牙髓压力对简化树脂粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度的影响

Influence of 3-month Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Simplified Resin Luting Systems.

作者信息

Bacchi Ataís, Abuna Gabriel, Babbar Ashvin, Sinhoreti Mário Alexandre Coelho, Feitosa Victor Pinheiro

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2015 Jun;17(3):265-71. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34414.

DOI:10.3290/j.jad.a34414
PMID:26159130
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of four simplified luting strategies to indirect composite restorations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dentin disks from 40 human molars were prepared and treated with 4 different techniques: (1) SB+ARC: two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive + conventional dual-curing resin cement (Adper Single Bond 2 + RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE); (2) ED+PAN: self-etching primer + conventional dual-curing resin cement (ED Primer + Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical); (3) S3+PAN: one-step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil S3, Kuraray) + Panavia F2.0; (4) U200: self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE). Pre-made indirect composite restorations (Filtek Z100, 3M ESPE) were luted onto the specimens. The luted specimens were cut into resin-dentin beams and the μTBS was tested after two different aging regimes: water storage at 37°C for one week (control) or three months under 20 cm H2O simulated pulpal pressure (SPP). The μTBS data was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

SB+ARC showed significantly higher μTBS after both aging regimes (p < 0.001). The statistically significantly lowest μTBS was measured for control S3+PAN and U200 after 3 months SPP (p < 0.001). S3+PAN was the only group not negatively affected by SPP (p = 0.699).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives associated with dual-curing conventional resin cements may achieve the highest μTBS, even after 3 months of SPP. The one-step self-etching adhesive along with the dualcuring conventional resin cement was able to maintain bond stability.

摘要

目的

评估模拟牙髓压力(SPP)对四种简化粘结策略用于间接复合树脂修复体的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。

材料与方法

制备40颗人类磨牙的牙本质片,并用4种不同技术进行处理:(1)SB + ARC:两步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂 + 传统双重固化树脂水门汀(Adper Single Bond 2 + RelyX ARC,3M ESPE);(2)ED + PAN:自酸蚀底漆 + 传统双重固化树脂水门汀(ED Primer + Panavia F2.0,可乐丽医疗);(3)S3 + PAN:一步自酸蚀粘结剂(Clearfil S3,可乐丽)+ Panavia F2.0;(4)U200:自粘结树脂水门汀(RelyX U200,3M ESPE)。将预制的间接复合树脂修复体(Filtek Z100,3M ESPE)粘结到标本上。将粘结后的标本切割成树脂 - 牙本质梁,并在两种不同的老化条件后测试μTBS:在37°C水中储存一周(对照)或在20 cm H2O模拟牙髓压力(SPP)下储存三个月。μTBS数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。

结果

在两种老化条件下,SB + ARC均显示出显著更高的μTBS(p < 0.001)。在3个月SPP后,对照S3 + PAN和U200的μTBS在统计学上显著最低(p < 0.001)。S3 + PAN是唯一不受SPP负面影响的组(p = 0.699)。

结论

即使在3个月的SPP后,与双重固化传统树脂水门汀相关联 的两步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂可能实现最高的μTBS。一步自酸蚀粘结剂与双重固化传统树脂水门汀能够维持粘结稳定性。

相似文献

1
Influence of 3-month Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Simplified Resin Luting Systems.3个月模拟牙髓压力对简化树脂粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Jun;17(3):265-71. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34414.
2
Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cements to human dentin.牙髓压力对粘结树脂水门汀与人类牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2009 Jan;25(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
3
Microtensile bond strength between indirect composite resin inlays and dentin: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical aging.间接复合树脂嵌体与牙本质之间的微拉伸粘结强度:粘结策略和机械老化的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Aug;16(4):357-63. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a31801.
4
The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.粘结系统对牙本质与间接树脂基复合材料及陶瓷修复体之间微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):328-36. doi: 10.2341/08-101.
5
Slow progression of dentin bond degradation during one-year water storage under simulated pulpal pressure.在模拟牙髓压力下一年水储存期间牙本质结合降解的缓慢进展。
J Dent. 2010 Oct;38(10):802-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
6
Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin.唾液污染对树脂水门汀与牙本质粘结强度的影响。
J Dent. 2009 Dec;37(12):923-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
7
Effect of surface preparation on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin.表面处理对树脂水门汀与牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):624-33. doi: 10.2341/09-379-L.
8
Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems.新型自粘结黏固剂与传统多步骤系统的微拉伸黏结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Nov;102(5):306-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3.
9
Hydrolytic degradation of the resin-dentine interface induced by the simulated pulpal pressure, direct and indirect water ageing.模拟牙髓压力、直接和间接水老化对树脂-牙本质界面的水解降解作用。
J Dent. 2012 Dec;40(12):1134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
10
Bond durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/without-fluoride after aging in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation.在人工唾液和牙髓内压力模拟老化后,含/不含氟改性单体的胶粘剂的粘结耐久性。
Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):48-56. doi: 10.2341/11-389-L. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of microtensile bond strength and marginal adaptation of fiber-reinforced composites.纤维增强复合材料的微拉伸粘结强度及边缘适合性评估。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Nov;27(11):1120-1125. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_515_24. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature.间接修复体粘结中使用的粘结系统:文献综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jul 1;7(3):71. doi: 10.3390/dj7030071.
3
Effect of dentin pretreatment on shear bond strength of three resin-based luting cements.牙本质预处理对三种树脂类粘结水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响。
Eur Oral Res. 2018 May;52(2):82-88. doi: 10.26650/eor.2018.449. Epub 2018 May 1.
4
Biomimetic Mineralizing Agents Recover the Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Demineralized Dentin.仿生矿化剂可恢复脱矿牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。
Materials (Basel). 2018 Sep 14;11(9):1733. doi: 10.3390/ma11091733.