Suppr超能文献

心理化与辩证行为疗法。

Mentalization and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.

作者信息

Swenson Charles R, Choi-Kain Lois W

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychother. 2015;69(2):199-217. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2015.69.2.199.

Abstract

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) are two approaches to the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). While DBT has the most empirical support, MBT has a small but significant evidence base. Dialectical behavior therapy synthesizes behaviorism, mindfulness, and dialectics, while MBT is conceptually anchored in psychoanalysis, attachment theory, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental psychopathology. While coming from strikingly different orientations, DBT and MBT therapists share more interventions and stances than one might suppose. The central purported active ingredient of MBT is the capacity to mentalize, which is crucial for the formation of secure attachment, and this ability is thought to be weak and unstable in individuals with borderline personality disorder. This article explores the question of whether or not mentalizing is already present in DBT practice, whether it would be compatible with DBT conceptually and practically, and whether a focus on mentalizing would be of use to the DBT therapists and their patients.

摘要

辩证行为疗法(DBT)和基于心理化的治疗(MBT)是治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的两种方法。虽然DBT有最多的实证支持,但MBT也有少量但重要的证据基础。辩证行为疗法综合了行为主义、正念和辩证法,而MBT在概念上扎根于精神分析、依恋理论、认知神经科学和发展性精神病理学。虽然DBT和MBT疗法来自截然不同的方向,但它们共享的干预措施和立场比人们想象的要多。MBT所谓的核心有效成分是心理化能力,这对形成安全依恋至关重要,而这种能力在边缘型人格障碍患者中被认为是薄弱且不稳定的。本文探讨了DBT实践中是否已经存在心理化,它在概念和实践上是否与DBT兼容,以及关注心理化是否对DBT治疗师及其患者有用的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验