Schetter Christine Dunkel, Dolbier Christyn
University of California.
Eastern Carolina University.
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2011 Sep;5(9):634-652. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00379.x.
Over the past several decades, stress research has experienced a broadening of its pathologic focus to encompass the concept of resilience. There is a wealth of research on resilience but no general consensus regarding its conceptualization. Some define resilience as attaining eventual favorable outcomes following exposure to adversity. Others define it as specific relatively short-term responses characterized by a return to homeostasis after initial disruption due to a stressor, and still others refer to resilience as resources that enable the individual to withstand or recover from major stressors. Many of the existing conceptualizations of resilience are not applicable in the context of chronic stress which is particularly harmful to health. How do adults who experience chronic stress survive, manage, and thrive, and what resources enable them to do so? In this paper, we consider these questions by reviewing traditions of research and definitions of resilience in order to inform an understanding of resilience in general, and for the study of chronic stress in adults. Based on a review of the literature, we developed a taxonomy of resilience resources that can be applied broadly, and guide future research.
在过去几十年里,压力研究的病理学重点范围不断扩大,将复原力的概念也涵盖在内。关于复原力有大量研究,但在其概念界定上尚未达成普遍共识。一些人将复原力定义为在经历逆境后最终取得有利结果。另一些人将其定义为特定的相对短期反应,其特征是在因应激源导致最初的紊乱后恢复到内稳态,还有一些人将复原力视为使个体能够承受重大应激源或从中恢复的资源。现有的许多复原力概念在慢性应激的背景下并不适用,而慢性应激对健康特别有害。经历慢性应激的成年人是如何生存、应对并茁壮成长的,以及哪些资源使他们能够做到这些?在本文中,我们通过回顾研究传统和复原力的定义来思考这些问题,以便总体上增进对复原力的理解,并用于研究成年人的慢性应激。基于对文献的回顾,我们制定了一个可广泛应用的复原力资源分类法,并指导未来的研究。