Kaminsky Alexander J, Patel Ketan M, Cocilovo Costanza, Nahabedian Maurice Y, Miraliakbari Reza
1 INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA ; 2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA ; 3 Private Practice, Fairfax Virginia, USA.
Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):257-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.07.
Oncoplastic techniques for breast reconstruction following partial mastectomy are now commonly included in the armamentarium of most reconstructive plastic surgeons. These techniques have been frequently used for women with large breast volume and less frequently used form women with small to moderate breast volume. Most women with smaller breast volumes have been typically considered for mastectomy. As an alternative to mastectomy, the biplanar technique was designed and described as an oncoplastic option. The purpose of this manuscript is to review our 2-year experience using this technique in a series of women with small to moderate breast volume.
A retrospective review of patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery from 2011-2012 by the senior authors (RM and MYN) was completed. Ten patients were identified that had the biplanar technique involving glandular tissue rearrangement in conjunction with the immediate placement of a submuscular implant or tissue expander. Patient demographics, perioperative details, and post-operative outcomes were evaluated.
The mean age and BMI of the ten patients in the study was 56 years (range, 40-68 years) and 24.1 years (range, 20.3-28.6 years) respectively. The mean resection volume was 76.5 g (range, 25-164 g). Eight patients had placement of a permanent implant and two patients had placement of a tissue expander. The average volume of the implanted devices was 138 cc (range, 90-300 cc). In eight patients, a sheet of acellular dermal matrix was used. Immediate biplanar reconstruction was performed in seven patients and a staged-immediate biplanar reconstruction was performed in three patients. Complications included a positive margin on final pathology requiring mastectomy (n=1), infection (n=1), incisional dehiscence following radiation (n=1), and loss of nipple sensation (n=2). Follow-up ranged from 4.5-27 months (mean of 19.5 months).
The biplanar oncoplastic technique may represent a valuable option in women with small to moderate breast volumes that choose to have breast conservation therapy (BCT). This technique has demonstrated success with minimizing contour irregularities and maintaining breast volume. Based on our early experience, patient satisfaction is favorable.
保乳切除术后乳房重建的肿瘤整形技术现已普遍纳入大多数整形重建外科医生的技术储备。这些技术常用于乳房体积较大的女性,而较少用于乳房体积小至中等的女性。大多数乳房体积较小的女性通常会考虑进行乳房切除术。作为乳房切除术的替代方法,双平面技术被设计并描述为一种肿瘤整形选择。本文的目的是回顾我们在一系列乳房体积小至中等的女性中使用该技术的2年经验。
对资深作者(RM和MYN)在2011年至2012年期间接受肿瘤整形手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。确定了10例采用双平面技术的患者,该技术涉及腺体组织重排并立即植入胸肌下植入物或组织扩张器。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、围手术期细节和术后结果。
研究中的10例患者的平均年龄和体重指数分别为56岁(范围40 - 68岁)和24.1(范围20.3 - 28.6)。平均切除量为76.5克(范围25 - 164克)。8例患者植入了永久性植入物,2例患者植入了组织扩张器。植入装置的平均体积为138立方厘米(范围90 - 300立方厘米)。8例患者使用了一片脱细胞真皮基质。7例患者进行了即时双平面重建,3例患者进行了分期即时双平面重建。并发症包括最终病理切缘阳性需要进行乳房切除术(n = 1)、感染(n = 1)、放疗后切口裂开(n = 1)和乳头感觉丧失(n = 2)。随访时间为4.5 - 27个月(平均19.5个月)。
双平面肿瘤整形技术对于选择保乳治疗(BCT)的乳房体积小至中等的女性可能是一种有价值的选择。该技术已成功减少外形不规则并维持乳房体积。基于我们的早期经验,患者满意度良好。