Laboratory of Personality and Cognition, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;5(1):93-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691609357017. Epub 2010 Jan 1.
According to cross-temporal meta-analyses (Twenge, 2000, 2001), social trends over the last decades have powerfully influenced the personality profiles of children and students, with effects accounting for 20% of the variance of Neuroticism and Extraversion. However, Trzesniewski and Donnellan (2010, this issue), who examined a large and representative U.S. high-school student sample, found little evidence of secular trends. In this commentary, I emphasize the distinction between cohort and period effects and review findings from longitudinal and cross-cultural studies on the role of social trends and other cultural influences on personality traits. Analyses of adult personality scores from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging provide little support for powerful secular effects on Neuroticism and Extraversion; evidence supports a secular trend of declining trust, along with additional small effects on other facets of personality. Analyses of personality scores from around the world suggest that social and cultural differences account for about 5% of the variance on major dimensions of personality. The integration of findings from multiple perspectives provides useful insights into the role of the environment on personality traits.
根据跨时间元分析(Twenge,2000 年,2001 年),过去几十年的社会趋势强烈影响了儿童和学生的人格特征,对神经质和外向性的变异解释率达到 20%。然而,Trzesniewski 和Donnellan(2010 年,本期特刊),他们检查了一个大型的、具有代表性的美国高中生样本,发现几乎没有证据表明存在长期趋势。在这篇评论中,我强调了队列效应和周期效应之间的区别,并回顾了关于社会趋势和其他文化因素对人格特质影响的纵向和跨文化研究结果。对巴尔的摩纵向老龄化研究中成人人格分数的分析几乎没有提供有力的证据表明神经质和外向性存在强大的长期影响;有证据表明,信任度呈下降趋势,此外,人格的其他方面也有一些较小的影响。对来自世界各地的人格分数的分析表明,社会和文化差异占人格主要维度变异的 5%左右。从多个角度综合研究结果,有助于深入了解环境对人格特质的作用。