Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;5(1):81-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691609357015. Epub 2010 Jan 1.
A substantial majority of published studies have reported increases of individualism and materialism and declines in mental health and interpersonal trust over generations. The data Trzesniewski and Donnellan (2010, this issue) present from the Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey of high-school students is almost entirely consistent with these previous findings, showing decreases in civic interest and trust and increases in high expectations, materialism, and self-satisfaction. Problems with measurement and variable labeling explain the few seeming discrepancies. They analyze only 15% of the variables in MTF, ignoring many others that also demonstrate increases in individualistic traits. Ecological correlations are not an issue in previous studies as the individual-level standard deviation is used to compute effect sizes. Increases in narcissism are clear when important moderator variables (e.g., campus) are controlled. The real puzzle is why these authors' conclusions fall so far from the data.
绝大多数已发表的研究报告表明,个体主义和物质主义呈上升趋势,而心理健康和人际信任则呈下降趋势。特雷斯涅夫斯基和唐纳伦(2010 年,本期)从监测未来(MTF)高中生调查中提供的数据几乎完全与这些先前的发现一致,显示公民兴趣和信任的减少以及高期望、物质主义和自我满足感的增加。测量和变量标签的问题解释了少数看似不一致的地方。他们只分析了 MTF 中的 15%的变量,忽略了许多其他也显示出个体主义特征增加的变量。在以前的研究中,生态相关性不是问题,因为个体水平的标准差用于计算效应大小。当控制重要的调节变量(例如,校园)时,自恋的增加是显而易见的。真正的难题是为什么这些作者的结论与数据相差如此之大。