Harvard Business School, Boston, MA,
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393524. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Disagreements about the optimal level of wealth inequality underlie policy debates ranging from taxation to welfare. We attempt to insert the desires of "regular" Americans into these debates, by asking a nationally representative online panel to estimate the current distribution of wealth in the United States and to "build a better America" by constructing distributions with their ideal level of inequality. First, respondents dramatically underestimated the current level of wealth inequality. Second, respondents constructed ideal wealth distributions that were far more equitable than even their erroneously low estimates of the actual distribution. Most important from a policy perspective, we observed a surprising level of consensus: All demographic groups-even those not usually associated with wealth redistribution such as Republicans and the wealthy-desired a more equal distribution of wealth than the status quo.
对财富不平等的最佳水平存在分歧,这是从税收到福利等政策辩论的基础。我们试图通过要求一个全国代表性的在线小组来评估美国当前的财富分配,并通过构建他们理想的不平等水平的分配来“建设一个更美好的美国”,从而将“普通”美国人的愿望纳入这些辩论。首先,受访者大大低估了当前的财富不平等程度。其次,受访者构建的理想财富分配比他们对实际分配的错误低估计还要公平得多。从政策角度来看,最重要的是,我们观察到了令人惊讶的共识水平:所有的人群——甚至是那些通常与财富再分配无关的人群,如共和党人和富人——都希望比现状更平等地分配财富。