• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智利大学生多维公平量表的改编与验证

Adaptation and Validation of the Multidimensional Fairness Scale in Chilean University Students.

作者信息

Cea-Leiva Fredy, Dominguez-Lara Sergio, Salvo-Garrido Sonia

机构信息

Program de Doctorado en Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.

Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4781509, Chile.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;14(12):1148. doi: 10.3390/bs14121148.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121148
PMID:39767289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11672991/
Abstract

The Multidimensional Fairness Scale (MFS) assesses an individual's experience of fairness across the many contexts of daily life. It has been applied in the USA; however, the psychometric qualities of reliability and validity have not been examined in a Spanish-speaking population or among Chilean university students. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 377 university students to explore these properties. Students from public (46.2%) and private (53.8%) universities participated, with a mean age = 21.5 (SD = 3.3). CFA was performed, showing good goodness-of-fit indices (RMSEA = 0.08; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.96) for the model of three related factors (interpersonal, occupational, and societal) and good reliability indices. Although changes were made to the original structure, the tested model was consistent with the theoretical structure of the MFS, which allows its use on the Chilean university population.

摘要

多维公平量表(MFS)评估个体在日常生活诸多情境中的公平体验。它已在美国应用;然而,尚未在说西班牙语的人群或智利大学生中检验其信度和效度等心理测量学特性。对377名大学生进行了一项横断面研究以探究这些特性。来自公立大学(46.2%)和私立大学(53.8%)的学生参与其中,平均年龄为21.5岁(标准差 = 3.3)。进行了验证性因子分析(CFA),结果显示对于三个相关因子(人际、职业和社会)的模型具有良好的拟合优度指标(RMSEA = 0.08;CFI = 0.97;TLI = 0.96)以及良好的信度指标。尽管对原始结构进行了调整,但所测试的模型与MFS的理论结构一致,这使得它可用于智利大学生群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce4/11672991/eef77a3fd472/behavsci-14-01148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce4/11672991/eef77a3fd472/behavsci-14-01148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ce4/11672991/eef77a3fd472/behavsci-14-01148-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and Validation of the Multidimensional Fairness Scale in Chilean University Students.智利大学生多维公平量表的改编与验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;14(12):1148. doi: 10.3390/bs14121148.
2
Adaptation and Validation of the Perception of Anomie Scale in Chilean University Students.智利大学生失范感量表的适应性与效度验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(3):172. doi: 10.3390/bs14030172.
3
Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the 8-item emotion regulation questionnaire (ERQ-8) among Chinese university students.大学生 8 项情绪调节问卷(ERQ-8)的心理计量学特性和性别不变性在中国大学生中的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0296035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296035. eCollection 2024.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Decisional Balance Scale: A Confirmatory Study on Malaysian University Students.《决策平衡量表的心理测量特性:对马来西亚大学生的验证性研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082748.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale for Chinese University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.新冠恐惧量表中文版在大学生群体中的跨文化调适与验证:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;19(14):8624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148624.
6
Validity and reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire scale (PHQ-9) among university students of Bangladesh.孟加拉国大学生患者健康问卷量表(PHQ-9)的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0269634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269634. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA-2) questionnaire in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking adults.多维度内感受性意识评估问卷(MAIA-2)阿拉伯语翻译版在阿拉伯语成年非临床样本中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05067-2.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Orientation Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Study on Chinese University Students.《运动取向问卷的心理测量特性:对中国大学生的验证性研究》
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;9:574335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.574335. eCollection 2021.
9
Cross-sectional study of Australian medical student attitudes towards older people confirms a four-factor structure and psychometric properties of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential.澳大利亚医学生对老年人态度的横断面研究证实了澳大利亚老龄化语义差异的四因素结构和心理测量特性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 16;10(8):e036108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036108.
10
Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support among university of Ibadan medical students.伊巴丹大学医学院学生感知社会支持多维量表的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 7;13(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02823-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation and Validation of the Perception of Anomie Scale in Chilean University Students.智利大学生失范感量表的适应性与效度验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(3):172. doi: 10.3390/bs14030172.
2
Mattering Mediates Between Fairness and Well-being.重要性在公平与幸福之间起中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 3;12:744201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744201. eCollection 2021.
3
The Association of Unfairness with Mental and Physical Health in a Multiethnic Sample of Adults: Cross-sectional Study.多民族成年人样本中心理和身体健康与不公平感的关联:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 10;7(5):e26622. doi: 10.2196/26622.
4
International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist.国际测试委员会测试改编指南:标准检查表。
Psicothema. 2020 Aug;32(3):390-398. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.306.
5
Happiness as fairness: The relationship between national life satisfaction and social justice in EU countries.幸福与公平:欧盟国家国民生活满意度与社会公正的关系。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Aug;48(6):1997-2012. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22398. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Social Justice and Public Cooperation Intention: Mediating Role of Political Trust and Moderating Effect of Outcome Dependence.社会正义与公共合作意愿:政治信任的中介作用及结果依赖的调节效应
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01381. eCollection 2018.
7
Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies.工作中的幸福感与社会环境:干预研究的系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 16;14(8):918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080918.
8
Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.双因素统计指标在心理测量评估中的应用。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):223-37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
10
Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile at a Time.建设更美好的美国——一次一个财富五分位数。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393524. Epub 2011 Feb 3.