Suppr超能文献

在牧场提供便携式遮阳设施对奶牛行为和生理的影响。

The effects of providing portable shade at pasture on dairy cow behavior and physiology.

作者信息

Palacio S, Bergeron R, Lachance S, Vasseur E

机构信息

Organic Dairy Research Centre, Université de Guelph, Campus d'Alfred, Alfred, ON, K0B 1A0, Canada.

Organic Dairy Research Centre, Université de Guelph, Campus d'Alfred, Alfred, ON, K0B 1A0, Canada.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):6085-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8932. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

Abstract

Access to pasture has advantages for cows such as reduced lameness and improved udder health, but also may expose cows to stressors such as extreme heat. The objective of this study was to understand how portable shade affected physiological and behavioral responses of pastured dairy cows in a Canadian summer. Over 8wk, a total of 24 lactating Holstein cows were separated into 2 treatments, one with access to shade and a control without access to shade. The cows were pastured in groups of 4, with 3 field sections per treatment. Instantaneous scan sampling of behaviors (drinking, lying, grazing, other) performed in the shade or not were recorded every 5min for 3h/d during the hottest part of the day (peak hours: 1130-1530h) 3d/wk. Ambient temperature, humidity, and vaginal temperature were recorded at 10-min intervals. Daily milk production was also recorded. Differences between treatments by week were analyzed using the generalized linear mixed model with group as random effect and treatment as fixed effect. Cows with shade access were observed at the water trough up to 6.42 times less and lying down up to 1.75 times more. Cows with shade access grazed up to 1.5 times more but only when the temperature-humidity index was above their comfort threshold (≥72) during the hottest part of the day (wk 2). Cows sought shade when it was made available, but spent less than half of their time observed (%) in the shade (40.8±4.67) with the exception of wk 2 when most of the time was spent under the shade (74.3±4.77). Daily lying time was highest during peak hours for cows with shade access. However, no overall difference in total lying time between the 2 treatments was observed. No differences were found in vaginal temperature or milk production between treatments with the exception of wk 1 for daily milk production, which was higher for cows in the control treatment. In conclusion, cows sought shade when it was provided at pasture, whereas cows without access to shade seemed to alter their behavior to cope with heat stress, as seen from the lack of physiological differences between treatments. The results indicate that providing cows with access to pasture under a temperate climate does not seem to have any detrimental physiological or production effects and providing them with shade can potentially decrease production costs and help with water conservation strategies as fewer cows were observed at the water when shade was provided.

摘要

能够进入牧场对奶牛有诸多益处,比如减少跛足和改善乳房健康,但这也可能使奶牛面临诸如酷热等应激源。本研究的目的是了解便携式遮阳设施如何影响加拿大夏季牧场放牧奶牛的生理和行为反应。在8周的时间里,总共24头泌乳期荷斯坦奶牛被分为2组处理,一组可以使用遮阳设施,另一组作为对照组不使用遮阳设施。奶牛以每组4头的方式放牧,每个处理有3个放牧区域。在一天中最热的时段(高峰时段:11:30 - 15:30),每周3天,每5分钟对在遮阳设施内或外的行为(饮水、躺卧、采食、其他)进行一次即时扫描取样,记录3小时。每隔10分钟记录环境温度、湿度和阴道温度。同时记录每日产奶量。使用广义线性混合模型分析每周处理组之间的差异,将组作为随机效应,处理作为固定效应。有遮阳设施的奶牛在水槽处被观察到的次数比对照组少6.42倍,躺卧次数比对照组多1.75倍。有遮阳设施的奶牛采食次数最多多1.5倍,但仅在一天中最热时段(第2周)温度 - 湿度指数高于其舒适阈值(≥72)时如此。有遮阳设施时奶牛会寻找遮阳处,但除第2周大部分时间都在遮阳处(74.3±4.77%)外,它们在遮阳处的时间占观察时间的比例不到一半(40.8±4.67%)。对于有遮阳设施的奶牛,每日躺卧时间在高峰时段最高。然而,两组处理在总躺卧时间上未观察到总体差异。除第1周每日产奶量外,两组处理在阴道温度或产奶量上未发现差异,第1周对照组奶牛的每日产奶量更高。总之,当牧场提供遮阳设施时奶牛会寻找遮阳处,而没有遮阳设施的奶牛似乎会改变其行为以应对热应激,从处理组之间缺乏生理差异可以看出这一点。结果表明,在温带气候下为奶牛提供进入牧场的机会似乎不会产生任何有害的生理或生产影响,并且为它们提供遮阳设施可能会降低生产成本并有助于节水策略,因为提供遮阳设施时在水槽处观察到的奶牛数量更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验