Guermazi A, Eckstein F, Hayashi D, Roemer F W, Wirth W, Yang T, Niu J, Sharma L, Nevitt M C, Lewis C E, Torner J, Felson D T
Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Dec;23(12):2191-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
To provide a comprehensive simultaneous relation of various semiquantitative knee OA MRI features as well as the presence of baseline radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) to quantitative longitudinal cartilage loss.
We studied Multicenter OA Study (MOST) participants from a longitudinal observational study that included quantitative MRI measurement of cartilage thickness. These subjects also had Whole Organ MRI Score (WORMS) scoring of cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), meniscal pathology, and synovitis, as well as baseline radiographic evaluation for Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grading. Knee compartments were classified as progressors when exceeding thresholds of measurement variability in normal knees. All potential risk factors of cartilage loss were dichotomized into "present" (score ≥2 for cartilage, ≥1 for others) or "absent". Differences in baseline scores of ipsi-compartmental risk factors were compared between progressor and non-progressor knees by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, alignment axis (degrees) and baseline KL grade. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were calculated for medial femorotibial compartment (MFTC) and lateral femorotibial compartment (LFTC) cartilage loss. Cartilage loss across both compartments was studied using Generalized Estimating Equations.
196 knees of 196 participants were included (age 59.8 ± 6.3 years [mean ± SD], BMI 29.5 ± 4.6, 62% women). For combined analyses of MFTC and LFTC, baseline factors related to cartilage loss were radiographic OA (KL grade ≥2: aOR 4.8 [2.4-9.5], cartilage damage (aOR 2.3 [1.2-4.4])), meniscal damage (aOR 3.9 [2.1-7.4]) and extrusion (aOR 2.9 [1.6-5.3]), all in the ipsilateral compartment, but not BMLs or synovitis.
Baseline radiographic OA and semiquantitatively (SQ) assessed MRI-detected cartilage damage, meniscal damage and extrusion, but not BMLs or synovitis is related to quantitatively measured ipsi-compartmental cartilage thinning over 30 months.
全面同时阐述各种半定量膝关节骨关节炎(OA)MRI特征以及基线放射学骨关节炎(OA)与定量纵向软骨丢失之间的关系。
我们对多中心OA研究(MOST)的参与者进行了一项纵向观察性研究,其中包括对软骨厚度的定量MRI测量。这些受试者还对软骨损伤、骨髓病变(BMLs)、半月板病变和滑膜炎进行了全器官MRI评分(WORMS),以及对Kellgren和Lawrence(KL)分级进行了基线放射学评估。当膝关节超过正常膝关节测量变异性阈值时,将其分类为进展者。将所有软骨丢失的潜在危险因素分为“存在”(软骨评分为≥2,其他为≥1)或“不存在”。通过多变量逻辑回归比较进展者和非进展者膝关节同侧间室危险因素基线评分的差异,并对年龄、性别、体重指数、对线轴(度数)和基线KL分级进行校正。计算内侧股胫间室(MFTC)和外侧股胫间室(LFTC)软骨丢失的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。使用广义估计方程研究两个间室的软骨丢失情况。
纳入了196名参与者的196个膝关节(年龄59.8±6.3岁[平均值±标准差],BMI 29.5±4.6,62%为女性)。对于MFTC和LFTC的联合分析,与软骨丢失相关的基线因素为放射学OA(KL分级≥2:调整后OR 4.8[2.4 - 9.5])、软骨损伤(调整后OR 2.3[1.2 - 4.4])、半月板损伤(调整后OR 3.9[2.1 - 7.4])和半月板挤出(调整后OR 2.9[1.6 - 5.3]),均在同侧间室,但不包括BMLs或滑膜炎。
基线放射学OA以及通过半定量(SQ)评估的MRI检测到的软骨损伤、半月板损伤和挤出与30个月内定量测量的同侧间室软骨变薄有关,但BMLs或滑膜炎与之无关。