Donati Robert J, Schappi Jeffrey, Czysz Andrew H, Jackson Alexander, Rasenick Mark M
Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612-7342, USA.
Basic and Health Science Department, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA.
BMC Neurosci. 2015 Jul 11;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0178-y.
Plasma membrane localization can play a significant role in the ultimate function of certain proteins. Specific membrane domains like lipid rafts have been shown to be inhibitory domains to a number of signaling proteins, including Gsα, and chronic antidepressant treatment facilitates Gs signaling by removing Gsα form lipid rafts. The intent of this study is to compare the effects of the selective serotnin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, with that of the mood stabilizing drug, lithium.
There are a number of mechanisms of action proposed for lithium as a mood stabilizing agent, but the interactions between G proteins (particularly Gs) and mood stabilizing drugs are not well explored. Of particular interest was the possibility that there was some effect of mood stabilizers on the association between Gsα and cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains (lipid rafts), similar to that seen with long-term antidepressant treatment. This was examined by biochemical and imaging (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: FRAP) approaches. Results indicate that escitalopram was effective at liberating Gsα from lipid rafts while lithium was not.
There are a number of drug treatments for mood disorders and yet there is no unifying hypothesis for a cellular or molecular basis of action. It is evident that there may in fact not be a single mechanism, but rather a number of different mechanisms that converge at a common point. The results of this study indicate that the mood stabilizing agent, lithium, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, act on their cellular targets through mutually exclusive pathways. These results also validate the hypothesis that translocation of Gsα from lipid rafts could serve as a biosignature for antidepressant action.
质膜定位在某些蛋白质的最终功能中可能发挥重要作用。特定的膜结构域,如脂筏,已被证明是许多信号蛋白(包括Gsα)的抑制结构域,长期抗抑郁治疗通过将Gsα从脂筏中移除来促进Gs信号传导。本研究的目的是比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂艾司西酞普兰与心境稳定剂锂的作用效果。
关于锂作为心境稳定剂有多种作用机制被提出,但G蛋白(特别是Gs)与心境稳定剂之间的相互作用尚未得到充分研究。特别令人感兴趣的是,心境稳定剂是否对Gsα与富含胆固醇的膜微结构域(脂筏)之间的关联有某些影响,类似于长期抗抑郁治疗所见的情况。通过生化和成像(光漂白后荧光恢复:FRAP)方法对此进行了研究。结果表明,艾司西酞普兰能有效将Gsα从脂筏中释放出来,而锂则不能。
有多种药物可用于治疗心境障碍,但对于其细胞或分子作用基础尚无统一的假说。显然,实际上可能不存在单一机制,而是有多种不同机制在一个共同点上汇聚。本研究结果表明,心境稳定剂锂和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂艾司西酞普兰通过相互排斥的途径作用于它们的细胞靶点。这些结果也验证了以下假说,即Gsα从脂筏中的易位可作为抗抑郁作用的生物标志。