Goodman Claire, Rycroft Malone Jo, Norton Christine, Harari Danielle, Harwood Rowan, Roe Brenda, Russell Bridget, Fader Mandy, Buswell Marina, Drennan Vari M, Bunn Frances
Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University School of Health Care Sciences, Bangor, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e007728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007728.
Faecal incontinence (FI) is the involuntary loss of liquid or solid stool that is a social or hygienic problem. The prevalence of FI in residents of care homes is high, but it is not an inevitable consequence of old age or dementia. There is good evidence on risk factors, but few studies provide evidence about effective interventions. There is a need to understand how, why, and in what circumstances particular programmes to reduce and manage FI are effective (or not) for people with dementia. The purpose of this review is to identify which (elements of the) interventions could potentially be effective, and examine the barriers and facilitators to the acceptability, uptake and implementation of interventions designed to address FI in people with dementia who are resident in care homes.
A realist synthesis approach to review the evidence will be used which will include studies on continence, person-centred care, implementation research in care homes, workforce and research on care home culture. An iterative four-stage approach is planned. Phase 1: development of an initial programme theory or theories that will be 'tested' through a first scoping of the literature and consultation with five stakeholder groups (care home providers, user representatives, academics and practice educators, clinicians with a special interest in FI and continence specialists). Phase 2: a systematic search and analysis of published and unpublished evidence to test and develop the programme theories identified in phase 1. Phase 3: validation of programme theory/ies with a purposive sample of participants from phase 1.
The overall protocol does not require ethical review. The University research ethics committee will review interviews conducted as part of phase 1 and 3. The final fourth phase will synthesise and develop recommendations for practice and develop testable hypotheses for further research.
大便失禁(FI)是指液体或固体粪便的不自主排出,这是一个社会或卫生问题。养老院居民中大便失禁的患病率很高,但它并非老年或痴呆症的必然结果。虽然有充分的证据表明存在风险因素,但很少有研究提供关于有效干预措施的证据。有必要了解特定的减少和管理大便失禁的方案如何、为何以及在何种情况下对患有痴呆症的人有效(或无效)。本综述的目的是确定哪些干预措施(的要素)可能有效,并研究旨在解决养老院中患有痴呆症的人的大便失禁问题的干预措施在可接受性、采用率和实施方面的障碍及促进因素。
将采用现实主义综合方法来审查证据,这将包括关于大小便控制、以人为本的护理、养老院实施研究、工作人员以及养老院文化研究的相关研究。计划采用迭代的四阶段方法。第1阶段:通过对文献的初步范围界定以及与五个利益相关者群体(养老院提供者、用户代表、学者和实践教育者、对大便失禁有特殊兴趣的临床医生以及大小便控制专家)进行协商,制定一个或多个初始方案理论,这些理论将被“检验”。第2阶段:对已发表和未发表的证据进行系统检索和分析,以检验和发展第1阶段确定的方案理论。第3阶段:使用来自第1阶段的目标参与者样本对方案理论进行验证。
总体方案无需伦理审查。大学研究伦理委员会将审查作为第1阶段和第3阶段一部分进行的访谈。最后的第4阶段将综合并制定实践建议,并为进一步研究提出可检验的假设。