Grabowski Mark, Roseman Charles C
Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Department of Anthropology, 179 Davenport Hall, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61820, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2015 Aug;85:94-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Causal explanations for the dramatic changes that occurred during the evolution of the human hip focus largely on selection for bipedal function and locomotor efficiency. These hypotheses rest on two critical assumptions. The first-that these anatomical changes served functional roles in bipedalism-has been supported in numerous analyses showing how postcranial changes likely affected locomotion. The second-that morphological changes that did play functional roles in bipedalism were the result of selection for that behavior-has not been previously explored and represents a major gap in our understanding of hominin hip evolution. Here we use evolutionary quantitative genetic models to test the hypothesis that strong directional selection on many individual aspects of morphology was responsible for the large differences observed across a sample of fossil hominin hips spanning the Plio-Pleistocene. Our approach uses covariance among traits and the differences between relatively complete fossils to estimate the net selection pressures that drove the major transitions in hominin hip evolution. Our findings show a complex and changing pattern of natural selection drove hominin hip evolution, and that many, but not all, traits hypothesized to play functional roles in bipedalism evolved as a direct result of natural selection. While the rate of evolutionary change for all transitions explored here does not exceed the amount expected if evolution was occurring solely through neutral processes, it was far above rates of evolution for morphological traits in other mammalian groups. Given that stasis is the norm in the mammalian fossil record, our results suggest that large shifts in the adaptive landscape drove hominin evolution.
对人类髋部在进化过程中发生的巨大变化的因果解释,很大程度上集中在对两足功能和运动效率的选择上。这些假说基于两个关键假设。第一个假设——这些解剖学变化在两足行走中发挥了功能作用——已在众多分析中得到支持,这些分析表明颅后变化可能如何影响运动。第二个假设——在两足行走中确实发挥功能作用的形态变化是该行为选择的结果——此前尚未被探讨,这代表了我们在理解古人类髋部进化方面的一个重大差距。在这里,我们使用进化定量遗传模型来检验这一假说,即对形态学许多个体方面的强烈定向选择导致了跨越上新世 - 更新世的化石古人类髋部样本中观察到的巨大差异。我们的方法利用性状之间的协方差以及相对完整化石之间的差异,来估计推动古人类髋部进化主要转变的净选择压力。我们的研究结果表明,复杂且不断变化的自然选择模式推动了古人类髋部的进化,并且许多(但并非全部)被认为在两足行走中发挥功能作用的性状是自然选择的直接结果。虽然这里探讨的所有转变的进化变化速率不超过仅通过中性过程发生进化时预期的量,但它远高于其他哺乳动物群体形态性状的进化速率。鉴于在哺乳动物化石记录中停滞是常态,我们的结果表明适应性景观的巨大转变推动了古人类的进化。