Andersen Lars P H, Gögenur Ismail, Fenger Andreas Q, Petersen Marian C, Rosenberg Jacob, Werner Mads U
Department of Surgery D, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark Multidisciplinary Pain Center 7612, Neuroscience Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pain. 2015 Nov;156(11):2286-2294. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000284.
Antinociceptive effects of melatonin have been documented in a wide range of experimental animal models. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic, antihyperalgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties of melatonin using a validated burn injury (BI) model in healthy male volunteers. The design was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-arm crossover study. Each volunteer participated in 3 identical study sessions with intravenous administration of placebo, melatonin 10 mg, or melatonin 100 mg. Sixty minutes after bolus injection of study medication, a BI was induced by a computerized contact thermode (47.0°C, 420 seconds, 5.0 × 2.5 cm). Pain ratings during the BI and quantitative sensory testing at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after the BI were performed. Quantitative sensory testing included assessments of secondary hyperalgesia areas, mechanical and thermal thresholds in the BI area, and pressure algometry. Furthermore, markers of inflammation, skin-reflectance spectrophotometry, and high-resolution ultrasonography were applied to measure skin erythema and dermal thickness in the BI area. Pain during the BI and secondary hyperalgesia areas were defined as primary outcomes. Twenty-nine volunteers were randomized and completed the study. While the BI induced large secondary hyperalgesia areas and significantly increased the markers of inflammation, no significant effects of melatonin were observed with respect to primary or secondary outcomes, compared with placebo. The administration of melatonin was not associated with any adverse effects. Melatonin did not demonstrate any analgesic, antihyperalgesic, or anti-inflammatory properties in the BI model.
褪黑素的抗伤害感受作用已在多种实验动物模型中得到证实。本研究的目的是在健康男性志愿者中,使用经过验证的烧伤损伤(BI)模型来研究褪黑素的镇痛、抗痛觉过敏和抗炎特性。该设计为一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、三臂交叉研究。每位志愿者参加3次相同的研究疗程,分别静脉注射安慰剂、10毫克褪黑素或100毫克褪黑素。在推注研究药物60分钟后,通过计算机控制的接触式热探头(47.0°C,420秒,5.0×2.5厘米)诱导烧伤损伤。在烧伤损伤期间进行疼痛评分,并在烧伤损伤前及损伤后1、2、4和6小时进行定量感觉测试。定量感觉测试包括对继发性痛觉过敏区域、烧伤损伤区域的机械和热阈值以及压力痛觉测定的评估。此外,应用炎症标志物、皮肤反射分光光度法和高分辨率超声检查来测量烧伤损伤区域的皮肤红斑和真皮厚度。将烧伤损伤期间的疼痛和继发性痛觉过敏区域定义为主要结局。29名志愿者被随机分组并完成了研究。虽然烧伤损伤诱导出大面积的继发性痛觉过敏区域并显著增加了炎症标志物,但与安慰剂相比,未观察到褪黑素对主要或次要结局有显著影响。褪黑素的给药未产生任何不良反应。在烧伤损伤模型中,褪黑素未表现出任何镇痛、抗痛觉过敏或抗炎特性。