Niemeijer Maartje N, van den Berg Marten E, Deckers Jaap W, Franco Oscar H, Hofman Albert, Kors Jan A, Stricker Bruno H, Rijnbeek Peter R, Eijgelsheim Mark
Department of Epidemiology.
Department of Medical Informatics.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Oct;12(10):2078-85. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
A prolonged heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval is a well-known risk indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and a contraindication for drugs with potentially arrhythmogenic adverse effects.
We aimed to study the consistency of QTc interval prolongation and whether a consistent QTc interval prolongation correlates differently with SCD than does an inconsistently prolonged QTc interval.
We used a population-based cohort study of persons 55 years and older. We excluded participants using QTc-prolonging drugs or with bundle branch block. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Bazett and Fridericia formulas. Using a Cox regression model, we assessed the association between QTc interval prolongation consistency and the occurrence of SCD.
A total of 3484 participants had electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded on 2 consecutive visits. In 96%-98% of participants with a normal QTc interval on the first ECG, the QTc interval remained normal, but only in 27%-35% of those with a prolonged QTc interval, the QTc interval was prolonged on the second ECG after a median of 1.8 years. A consistently prolonged QTc interval was associated with an increased risk of SCD as compared with a consistently normal QTc interval (Bazett: hazard ratio 2.23; 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.24, Fridericia: hazard ratio 6.67; 95% confidence interval 2.96-15.06). A prolonged QTc interval preceded or followed by a normal QTc interval was not significantly associated with an increased risk of SCD.
Persons with an inconsistently prolonged QTc interval did not have a higher risk of SCD than those with a consistently normal QTc interval. Persons with a consistently prolonged QTc interval did have a higher risk of SCD. Our results suggest that repeated measurements of the QTc interval could enhance risk stratification.
校正心率后的QT(QTc)间期延长是心源性猝死(SCD)的一个众所周知的风险指标,也是具有潜在致心律失常不良反应药物的禁忌证。
我们旨在研究QTc间期延长的一致性,以及与QTc间期不一致延长相比,一致延长的QTc间期与SCD的相关性是否不同。
我们对55岁及以上人群进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。我们排除了使用延长QTc药物或患有束支传导阻滞的参与者。使用Bazett和Fridericia公式对心率进行QT间期校正。使用Cox回归模型,我们评估了QTc间期延长一致性与SCD发生之间的关联。
共有3484名参与者在连续两次就诊时记录了心电图(ECG)。在首次ECG时QTc间期正常的参与者中,96%-98%的人QTc间期保持正常,但在QTc间期延长的参与者中,只有27%-35%的人在中位1.8年后的第二次ECG时QTc间期仍延长。与QTc间期始终正常相比,QTc间期持续延长与SCD风险增加相关(Bazett法:风险比2.23;95%置信区间1.17-4.24,Fridericia法:风险比6.67;95%置信区间2.96-15.06)。QTc间期先延长后正常或先正常后延长与SCD风险增加无显著关联。
QTc间期不一致延长的人发生SCD的风险并不高于QTc间期始终正常的人。QTc间期持续延长的人发生SCD的风险更高。我们的结果表明,重复测量QTc间期可以加强风险分层。