Hill Brandon J, Sanders Stephanie A, Crosby Richard A, Ingelhart Kara N, Janssen Erick
The University of Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Charles Mott Building, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Morrison Hall 313, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Sex Health. 2015 Oct;12(5):397-404. doi: 10.1071/SH14051.
Background Previous studies have associated men who experience condom-associated erection problems (CAEP) with incomplete condom use and/or foregoing using condoms altogether. However, how men respond to CAEP and what they attribute CAEP to, remains unclear. Understanding young men's CAEP responses and attributions could help improve sexually transmissible infections (STI)/HIV prevention programs and interventions.
Behavioural responses to, and attributions for, CAEP during application (CAEP-Application) and/or during penile-vaginal intercourse (CAEP-PVI) were reported using an online questionnaire by 295 young, heterosexual men (aged 18-24 years) who were recruited via social media websites and university Listservs across major cities in the Midwestern USA.
Behavioural responses to CAEP-Application included receiving oral or manual stimulation, stimulating a partner, self-stimulation, foregoing condom use and applying the condom after starting intercourse. Attributions for CAEP-Application included: distraction, fit and feel problems, application taking too long and having consumed too much alcohol. Behavioural responses to CAEP-PVI included increasing the intensity of intercourse, removing the condom to receive oral or manual stimulation and removing condom and continuing intercourse. Attributions for CAEP-PVI included: lack of sensation, taking too long to orgasm, not being 'turned on' enough, fit and feel problems and partner-related factors.
Men who report CAEP respond with both STI/HIV risk-reducing and potentially risk-increasing behaviours (e.g. forgoing condom use). Men attribute their experiences to a wide range of individual- and partner-level factors. Addressing men's CAEP behavioural responses and attributions may increase the efficacious value of condom programs and STI/HIV prevention interventions - particularly among men who experience CAEP.
背景 以往研究发现,经历与避孕套相关勃起问题(CAEP)的男性存在不完全使用避孕套和/或完全不使用避孕套的情况。然而,男性如何应对CAEP以及他们将CAEP归因于什么尚不清楚。了解年轻男性对CAEP的反应和归因有助于改善性传播感染(STI)/艾滋病毒预防计划和干预措施。
295名年龄在18 - 24岁的年轻异性恋男性通过美国中西部主要城市的社交媒体网站和大学邮件列表招募,他们使用在线问卷报告了在使用避孕套时(CAEP-使用阶段)和/或阴茎 - 阴道性交期间(CAEP-阴茎 - 阴道性交阶段)对CAEP的行为反应和归因。
对CAEP-使用阶段的行为反应包括接受口交或手动刺激、刺激伴侣、自我刺激、不使用避孕套以及开始性交后再戴上避孕套。对CAEP-使用阶段的归因包括:分心、尺寸和舒适度问题、戴套时间过长以及饮酒过量。对CAEP-阴茎 - 阴道性交阶段的行为反应包括增加性交强度、取下避孕套接受口交或手动刺激以及取下避孕套并继续性交。对CAEP-阴茎 - 阴道性交阶段的归因包括:感觉缺失、达到性高潮时间过长、兴奋不足、尺寸和舒适度问题以及与伴侣相关的因素。
报告有CAEP的男性会采取降低性传播感染/艾滋病毒风险的行为以及潜在增加风险的行为(例如不使用避孕套)。男性将他们的经历归因于广泛的个人和伴侣层面的因素。解决男性对CAEP的行为反应和归因可能会提高避孕套计划和性传播感染/艾滋病毒预防干预措施的有效价值——特别是在经历CAEP的男性中。