Suppr超能文献

小儿人工耳蜗植入技术会影响术中神经反应遥测阈值吗?

Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?

作者信息

Poley Marian, Overmyer Emma, Craun Patricia, Holcomb Meredith, Reilly Brian, White David, Preciado Diego

机构信息

Divisions of Pediatric Otolaryngology and Hearing and Speech, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;79(9):1404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent reports of mostly adult patients suggest round window insertion is less traumatic than cochleostomy for cochlear implantation (CI), while other reports have indicated that curved electrode arrays lower the neural response telemetry (NRT) threshold and consume less power. We aimed to compare the intraoperative neural response telemetry (NRT) thresholds in children receiving cochlear implants through a cochleostomy (COCH) vs. a round window (RW) approach, as well as patients receiving a curved array vs. a straight one.

DESIGN

A direct case-cohort comparison of NRT in pediatric CI recipients at two large tertiary pediatric hospitals from 2008 through 2014 was done. Univariate Mann-Whitney analyses and one-wayANOVA were performed to compare average NRT in RW vs. COCH insertion, and curved vs. straight electrodes. Multivariate regression was performed to control for age and pre- vs. postlingual patient status.

RESULTS

Overall, 236 children were included, between January 2008 and October 2014 at two large tertiary referral medical centers. A total of 52 patients received a RW insertion and 184 received a cochleostomy. There was no statistically significant difference between RW insertion (187.9±18.7) and COCH (183.4±17.1) (p=0.125). The patients were divided into four categories: RW insertion with curved electrode (175.0±11.2), RW with straight electrode (192.1±18.8), COCH with curved electrode (182.2±16.7), and COCH with straight electrode (193.0±20.8). The lowest NRT current thresholds were achieved with curved electrode array insertions through the RW (p=0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed the following parameters were not independently associated with differences in NRT responses: RWI vs. COCH (p=0.12) and pre- vs. postlingual (p=0.18). The difference in NRT levels between curved electrode arrays and straight was shown to be statistically significant (p=0.00075).

CONCLUSIONS

When controlling for insertion technique or pre- vs. postlingual hearing loss, the curved electrode array correlates with lower NRT thresholds. Although studies to examine functional language performance of these recipients are pending, initial results of this multi-institutional trial suggest that curved electrodes indeed result in lower NRT levels, particularly when inserted through the RW.

摘要

目的

近期大多针对成年患者的报告表明,对于人工耳蜗植入(CI),圆窗插入术比耳蜗造口术的创伤性更小,而其他报告指出,弯曲电极阵列可降低神经反应遥测(NRT)阈值并消耗更少电量。我们旨在比较通过耳蜗造口术(COCH)与圆窗(RW)途径接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童,以及接受弯曲电极阵列与直电极的患者术中的神经反应遥测(NRT)阈值。

设计

对2008年至2014年期间两家大型三级儿科医院的小儿人工耳蜗植入受者的NRT进行直接病例队列比较。进行单变量曼-惠特尼分析和单因素方差分析,以比较RW与COCH插入以及弯曲与直电极的平均NRT。进行多变量回归以控制年龄以及语前与语后患者状态。

结果

总体而言,在2008年1月至2014年10月期间,两家大型三级转诊医疗中心共纳入236名儿童。共有52例患者接受了RW插入,184例接受了耳蜗造口术。RW插入(187.9±18.7)与COCH(183.4±17.1)之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.125)。患者分为四类:使用弯曲电极的RW插入(175.0±11.2)、使用直电极的RW(192.1±18.8)、使用弯曲电极的COCH(182.2±16.7)以及使用直电极的COCH(193.0±20.8)。通过RW插入弯曲电极阵列时实现了最低的NRT电流阈值(p = 0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,以下参数与NRT反应差异无独立相关性:RWI与COCH(p = 0.12)以及语前与语后(p = 0.18)。弯曲电极阵列与直电极之间的NRT水平差异具有统计学显著性(p = 0.00075)。

结论

在控制插入技术或语前与语后听力损失时,弯曲电极阵列与较低的NRT阈值相关。尽管检查这些受者功能语言表现的研究尚在进行中,但这项多机构试验的初步结果表明,弯曲电极确实会导致较低的NRT水平,特别是通过RW插入时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验