Bach Jan-Philipp, Gold Maike, Mengel David, Hattesohl Akira, Lubbe Dirk, Schmid Severin, Tackenberg Björn, Rieke Jürgen, Maddula Sasidhar, Baumbach Jörg Ingo, Nell Christoph, Boeselt Tobias, Michelis Joan, Alferink Judith, Heneka Michael, Oertel Wolfgang, Jessen Frank, Janciauskiene Sabina, Vogelmeier Claus, Dodel Richard, Koczulla Andreas Rembert
Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132227. eCollection 2015.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is diagnosed based upon medical history, neuropsychiatric examination, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, extensive laboratory analyses and cerebral imaging. Diagnosis is time consuming and labour intensive. Parkinson's disease (PD) is mainly diagnosed on clinical grounds.
The primary aim of this study was to differentiate patients suffering from AD, PD and healthy controls by investigating exhaled air with the electronic nose technique. After demonstrating a difference between the three groups the secondary aim was the identification of specific substances responsible for the difference(s) using ion mobility spectroscopy. Thirdly we analysed whether amyloid beta (Aβ) in exhaled breath was causative for the observed differences between patients suffering from AD and healthy controls.
We employed novel pulmonary diagnostic tools (electronic nose device/ion-mobility spectrometry) for the identification of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Specifically, we analysed breath pattern differences in exhaled air of patients with AD, those with PD and healthy controls using the electronic nose device (eNose). Using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), we identified the compounds responsible for the observed differences in breath patterns. We applied ELISA technique to measure Aβ in exhaled breath condensates.
The eNose was able to differentiate between AD, PD and HC correctly. Using IMS, we identified markers that could be used to differentiate healthy controls from patients with AD and PD with an accuracy of 94%. In addition, patients suffering from PD were identified with sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Altogether, 3 AD patients out of 53 participants were misclassified. Although we found Aβ in exhaled breath condensate from both AD and healthy controls, no significant differences between groups were detected.
These data may open a new field in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Further research is required to evaluate the significance of these pulmonary findings with respect to the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是根据病史、神经精神检查、脑脊液分析、广泛的实验室分析和脑部成像来诊断的。诊断过程耗时且费力。帕金森病(PD)主要基于临床症状进行诊断。
本研究的主要目的是通过电子鼻技术检测呼出气体,以区分AD患者、PD患者和健康对照者。在证明三组之间存在差异后,次要目的是使用离子迁移谱法鉴定造成差异的特定物质。第三,我们分析了呼出气体中的β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)是否是导致AD患者与健康对照者之间观察到差异的原因。
我们采用新型肺部诊断工具(电子鼻设备/离子迁移谱仪)来识别神经退行性疾病患者。具体而言,我们使用电子鼻设备(eNose)分析了AD患者、PD患者和健康对照者呼出气体中的呼吸模式差异。使用离子迁移谱法(IMS),我们鉴定了导致观察到的呼吸模式差异的化合物。我们应用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术测量呼出气体冷凝物中的Aβ。
电子鼻能够正确区分AD、PD和健康对照者。使用IMS,我们鉴定出了可用于区分健康对照者与AD和PD患者的标志物,准确率为94%。此外,PD患者的识别灵敏度和特异性均为100%。在53名参与者中,共有3名AD患者被误分类。尽管我们在AD患者和健康对照者的呼出气体冷凝物中均发现了Aβ,但未检测到组间存在显著差异。
这些数据可能为阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病等神经退行性疾病的诊断开辟一个新领域。需要进一步研究来评估这些肺部发现对于神经退行性疾病病理生理学的意义。