Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):234-52. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406921.
The downstream consequences of a priming induction range from changes in the perception of objects in the environment to the initiation of prime-related behavior and goal striving. Although each of these outcomes has been accounted for by separate mechanisms, we argue that a single process could produce all three priming effects. In this article, we introduce the situated inference model of priming, discuss its potential to account for these divergent outcomes with one mechanism, and demonstrate its ability to organize the priming literatures surrounding these effects. According to the model, primes often do not cause direct effects, instead altering only the accessibility of prime-related mental content. This information produces downstream effects on judgment, behavior, or motivation when it is mistakenly viewed as originating from one's own internal thought processes. When this misattribution occurs, the prime-related mental content becomes a possible source of information for solving whatever problems are afforded by the current situation. Because different situations afford very different questions and concerns, the inferred meaning of this prime-related content can vary greatly. The use of this information to answer qualitatively different questions can lead a single prime to produce varied effects on judgment, behavior, and motivation.
启动诱导的下游后果范围从环境中物体感知的变化到启动相关行为和目标追求的启动。尽管这些结果中的每一个都被单独的机制所解释,但我们认为一个单一的过程可以产生所有三种启动效应。在本文中,我们介绍了启动的情境推理模型,讨论了它用一种机制解释这些不同结果的潜力,并展示了它组织围绕这些效应的启动文献的能力。根据该模型,启动词通常不会产生直接的影响,而只会改变与启动词相关的心理内容的可及性。当这些信息被错误地视为源自自己的内部思维过程时,它会对判断、行为或动机产生下游影响。当这种错误归因发生时,与启动词相关的心理内容就成为解决当前情境中提供的任何问题的可能信息来源。因为不同的情境提供了非常不同的问题和关注点,所以这个与启动词相关的内容的推断意义可能会有很大的不同。使用这些信息来回答性质完全不同的问题可以导致单个启动词对判断、行为和动机产生不同的影响。