Chan Steven, Torous John, Hinton Ladson, Yellowlees Peter
1 Department of Psychiatry, University of California Davis , Sacramento, California.
2 Harvard Longwood Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Dec;21(12):1038-41. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0002. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Mobile phones are ubiquitous in society and owned by a majority of psychiatric patients, including those with severe mental illness. Their versatility as a platform can extend mental health services in the areas of communication, self-monitoring, self-management, diagnosis, and treatment. However, the efficacy and reliability of publicly available applications (apps) have yet to be demonstrated. Numerous articles have noted the need for rigorous evaluation of the efficacy and clinical utility of smartphone apps, which are largely unregulated. Professional clinical organizations do not provide guidelines for evaluating mobile apps.
Guidelines and frameworks are needed to evaluate medical apps. Numerous frameworks and evaluation criteria exist from the engineering and informatics literature, as well as interdisciplinary organizations in similar fields such as telemedicine and healthcare informatics.
We propose criteria for both patients and providers to use in assessing not just smartphone apps, but also wearable devices and smartwatch apps for mental health. Apps can be evaluated by their usefulness, usability, and integration and infrastructure. Apps can be categorized by their usability in one or more stages of a mental health provider's workflow.
Ultimately, leadership is needed to develop a framework for describing apps, and guidelines are needed for both patients and mental health providers.
手机在社会中无处不在,大多数精神科患者都拥有手机,包括那些患有严重精神疾病的患者。手机作为一个平台,其多功能性可在通信、自我监测、自我管理、诊断和治疗等领域扩展心理健康服务。然而,公开可用应用程序(应用)的有效性和可靠性尚未得到证实。许多文章指出,需要对智能手机应用进行严格的有效性和临床实用性评估,而这些应用在很大程度上是不受监管的。专业临床组织并未提供评估移动应用的指南。
评估医疗应用需要指南和框架。工程学和信息学文献以及远程医疗和医疗保健信息学等类似领域的跨学科组织存在众多框架和评估标准。
我们提出了供患者和提供者用于评估的标准,不仅适用于智能手机应用,还适用于心理健康领域的可穿戴设备和智能手表应用。应用可通过其有用性、易用性以及集成性和基础设施来评估。应用可根据其在心理健康提供者工作流程一个或多个阶段的易用性进行分类。
最终,需要有领导力来制定描述应用的框架,患者和心理健康提供者都需要指南。