Brown Tiffany A, Keel Pamela K
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Sep;48(6):700-7. doi: 10.1002/eat.22433. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Cross-sectional studies support that bisexual and gay (BG) men are at increased risk for eating pathology, and romantic relationships may buffer against risk; however, no studies have examined this association longitudinally. The current study examined how romantic relationships impact the trajectory of eating pathology in BG versus heterosexual men.
BG (n = 51) and heterosexual (n = 522) men completed surveys of health and eating behaviors at baseline and 10-year follow-up.
For BG men, being single at baseline prospectively predicted an increase in Drive for Thinness scores over 10-year follow-up. Additionally, for BG men in relationships at baseline, lower relationship satisfaction predicted an increase in Drive for Thinness scores over time. Conversely, these relationship variables did not predict trajectory of eating pathology for heterosexual men.
Implications for theoretical models of risk, including objectification theory and sexual minority stress theory, and prevention, including peer-led cognitive dissonance based interventions, are discussed.
横断面研究表明,双性恋和男同性恋(BG)群体出现饮食失调问题的风险更高,而恋爱关系可能会降低这种风险;然而,尚无研究对这种关联进行纵向研究。本研究探讨了恋爱关系如何影响BG男性与异性恋男性饮食失调问题的发展轨迹。
BG男性(n = 51)和异性恋男性(n = 522)在基线和10年随访时完成了健康和饮食行为调查。
对于BG男性,基线时单身可前瞻性预测在10年随访期间追求瘦身得分增加。此外,对于基线时处于恋爱关系中的BG男性,较低的恋爱关系满意度可预测随着时间推移追求瘦身得分增加。相反,这些恋爱关系变量并不能预测异性恋男性饮食失调问题的发展轨迹。
讨论了其对风险理论模型(包括客体化理论和性少数群体压力理论)以及预防措施(包括同伴主导的基于认知失调的干预措施)的启示。