Boomsma Martijn F, Slouwerhof Inge, van Dalen Jorn A, Edens Mireille A, Mueller Dirk, Milles Julien, Maas Mario
Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Department of Innovation and Science, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Nov;44(11):1597-602. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2206-5. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
The purpose of this research is to study the use of an internal reference standard for fat- and muscle as a replacement for an external reference standard with a phantom. By using a phantomless internal reference standard, Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements of various tissues can potentially be assessed in patients with a CT scan of the pelvis without an added phantom at time of CT acquisition. This paves the way for development of a tool for quantification of the change in tissue density in one patient over time and between patients. This could make every CT scan made without contrast available for research purposes.
Fifty patients with unilateral metal-on-metal total hip replacements, scanned together with a calibration reference phantom used in bone mineral density measurements, were included in this study. On computed tomography scans of the pelvis without the use of intravenous iodine contrast, reference values for fat and muscle were measured in the phantom as well as within the patient's body. The conformity between the references was examined with the intra-class correlation coefficient.
The mean HU (± SD) of reference values for fat for the internal- and phantom references were -91.5 (±7.0) and -90.9 (±7.8), respectively. For muscle, the mean HU (± SD) for the internal- and phantom references were 59.2 (±6.2) and 60.0 (±7.2), respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients for fat and muscle were 0.90 and 0.84 respectively and show excellent agreement between the phantom and internal references.
Internal references can be used with similar accuracy as references from an external phantom. There is no need to use an external phantom to asses CT density measurements of body tissue.
本研究的目的是探讨使用脂肪和肌肉的内部参考标准替代带有体模的外部参考标准。通过使用无体模的内部参考标准,在CT采集骨盆扫描时无需额外添加体模,就有可能对患者各种组织的亨氏单位(HU)测量值进行评估。这为开发一种工具奠定了基础,该工具可用于量化一名患者随时间以及不同患者之间组织密度的变化。这使得每一次未使用对比剂的CT扫描都可用于研究目的。
本研究纳入了50例单侧金属对金属全髋关节置换患者,他们与用于骨密度测量的校准参考体模一起进行扫描。在未使用静脉碘造影剂的骨盆计算机断层扫描中,测量体模以及患者体内脂肪和肌肉的参考值。用组内相关系数检验参考值之间的一致性。
内部参考和体模参考的脂肪参考值平均HU(±标准差)分别为-91.5(±7.0)和-90.9(±7.8)。对于肌肉,内部参考和体模参考的平均HU(±标准差)分别为59.2(±6.2)和60.0(±7.2)。脂肪和肌肉的组内相关系数分别为0.90和0.84,表明体模参考和内部参考之间具有极好的一致性。
内部参考的使用精度与外部体模参考相似。无需使用外部体模来评估身体组织的CT密度测量值。