Suppr超能文献

老年人对医疗保健决策中权衡取舍的认知。

Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making.

作者信息

Case Siobhan M, O'Leary John, Kim Nancy, Tinetti Mary E, Fried Terri R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug;63(8):1658-62. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13534. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine older persons' understanding of healthcare decision-making involving trade-offs.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Primary care clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).

MEASUREMENTS

After being primed to think about trade-offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade-off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade-off.

RESULTS

Forty-four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade-off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade-off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end-of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.

CONCLUSION

The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade-offs involved in healthcare decision-making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade-offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade-offs involved in day-to-day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high-stakes decisions including surgery and end-of-life care.

摘要

目的

研究老年人对涉及权衡取舍的医疗保健决策的理解。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

初级保健诊所。

参与者

65岁及以上的社区居住者(N = 50)。

测量方法

在引导参与者思考以慢性病管理为重点的权衡取舍之后,要求他们描述过去做出的涉及权衡取舍的决策。如果他们想不起来,就要求他们描述未来可能面临的决策,然后给出一个决策示例。还询问了他们在面临权衡取舍时与初级保健提供者就其优先事项进行沟通的情况。

结果

44名参与者(88%)能够描述涉及权衡取舍的医疗保健决策;25人提供了过去的决策,17人提供了未来可能面临的决策,2人在听到示例后提供了未来的决策。1名参与者描述了一个非医疗决策,2名参与者描述了目标但未提及权衡取舍。在医疗保健决策中,26项涉及手术,7项是临终决策,7项涉及慢性病治疗,4项涉及化疗。当被问及他们的医疗服务提供者是否应该了解他们对健康结果的优先事项时,44人(88%)回答是,35人(70%)认为他们的医疗服务提供者了解他们的优先事项,但只有18人(36%)表示他们曾就优先事项进行过具体的交谈。

结论

大多数参与者能够认识到医疗保健决策中涉及的权衡取舍,并希望他们的医疗服务提供者了解他们在权衡取舍方面的优先事项。尽管引导参与者思考了慢性病日常治疗中涉及的权衡取舍,但参与者最常描述的是偶发性的、高风险的决策,包括手术和临终护理。

相似文献

1
Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug;63(8):1658-62. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13534. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
2
Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-192.
3
Considering the balance: development of a scale to assess patient views on trade-offs in competing health outcomes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Aug;61(8):1331-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12358. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
Challenges and strategies in patients' health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218249. eCollection 2019.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs.
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Mar-Apr;76(2):137-8, 143-8, 150.
7
Chronic Disease Decision Making and "What Matters Most".
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):474-477. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16371. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

2
Use of Palliative Interventions at End of Life for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7281-7292. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12342-1. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
4
Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study.
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Sep;9(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000798.
5
'What matters to you?' Health outcome prioritisation in treatment decision-making for older patients.
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):2264-2269. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab160.
7
Development of a Program Promoting Person-Centered Care of Older Adults with Sleep Apnea.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2204-2207. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16084. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
Statins for Primary Prevention in Older Adults-Moving Toward Evidence-Based Decision-Making.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2188-2196. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15449. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
10
Multimorbidity in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):2149-2161. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.022.

本文引用的文献

2
Evidence-based practice is not synonymous with delivery of uniform health care.
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1293-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10713.
3
Statins and physical activity in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1263-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2266.
6
Considering the balance: development of a scale to assess patient views on trade-offs in competing health outcomes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Aug;61(8):1331-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12358. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
7
Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1854-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.424. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
8
Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):85S-95S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10380466.
9
Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Oct;56(10):1839-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01923.x. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验