Case Siobhan M, O'Leary John, Kim Nancy, Tinetti Mary E, Fried Terri R
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Aug;63(8):1658-62. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13534. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
To examine older persons' understanding of healthcare decision-making involving trade-offs.
Cross-sectional survey.
Primary care clinics.
Community-living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).
After being primed to think about trade-offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade-off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade-off.
Forty-four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade-off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade-off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end-of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.
The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade-offs involved in healthcare decision-making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade-offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade-offs involved in day-to-day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high-stakes decisions including surgery and end-of-life care.
研究老年人对涉及权衡取舍的医疗保健决策的理解。
横断面调查。
初级保健诊所。
65岁及以上的社区居住者(N = 50)。
在引导参与者思考以慢性病管理为重点的权衡取舍之后,要求他们描述过去做出的涉及权衡取舍的决策。如果他们想不起来,就要求他们描述未来可能面临的决策,然后给出一个决策示例。还询问了他们在面临权衡取舍时与初级保健提供者就其优先事项进行沟通的情况。
44名参与者(88%)能够描述涉及权衡取舍的医疗保健决策;25人提供了过去的决策,17人提供了未来可能面临的决策,2人在听到示例后提供了未来的决策。1名参与者描述了一个非医疗决策,2名参与者描述了目标但未提及权衡取舍。在医疗保健决策中,26项涉及手术,7项是临终决策,7项涉及慢性病治疗,4项涉及化疗。当被问及他们的医疗服务提供者是否应该了解他们对健康结果的优先事项时,44人(88%)回答是,35人(70%)认为他们的医疗服务提供者了解他们的优先事项,但只有18人(36%)表示他们曾就优先事项进行过具体的交谈。
大多数参与者能够认识到医疗保健决策中涉及的权衡取舍,并希望他们的医疗服务提供者了解他们在权衡取舍方面的优先事项。尽管引导参与者思考了慢性病日常治疗中涉及的权衡取舍,但参与者最常描述的是偶发性的、高风险的决策,包括手术和临终护理。