Averina Viktoria A, Othmer Hans G, Fink Gregory D, Osborn John W
Department of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
J Physiol. 2015 Jul 15;593(14):3065-75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.278317. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Salt sensitivity of arterial pressure (salt-sensitive hypertension) is a serious global health issue. The causes of salt-sensitive hypertension are extremely complex and mathematical models can elucidate potential mechanisms that are experimentally inaccessible. Until recently, the only mathematical model for long-term control of arterial pressure was the model of Guyton and Coleman; referred to as the G-C model. The core of this model is the assumption that sodium excretion is driven by renal perfusion pressure, the so-called 'renal function curve'. Thus, the G-C model dictates that all forms of hypertension are due to a primary shift of the renal function curve to a higher operating pressure. However, several recent experimental studies in a model of hypertension produced by the combination of a high salt intake and administration of angiotensin II, the AngII-salt model, are inconsistent with the G-C model. We developed a new mathematical model that does not limit the cause of salt-sensitive hypertension solely to primary renal dysfunction. The model is the first known mathematical counterexample to the assumption that all salt-sensitive forms of hypertension require a primary shift of renal function: we show that in at least one salt-sensitive form of hypertension the requirement is not necessary. We will refer to this computational model as the 'neurogenic model'. In this Symposium Review we discuss how, despite fundamental differences between the G-C model and the neurogenic model regarding mechanisms regulating sodium excretion and vascular resistance, they generate similar haemodynamic profiles of AngII-salt hypertension. In addition, the steady-state relationships between arterial pressure and sodium excretion, a correlation that is often erroneously presented as the 'renal function curve', are also similar in both models. Our findings suggest that salt-sensitive hypertension is not due solely to renal dysfunction, as predicted by the G-C model, but may also result from neurogenic dysfunction.
动脉血压的盐敏感性(盐敏感性高血压)是一个严重的全球性健康问题。盐敏感性高血压的病因极其复杂,数学模型可以阐明一些通过实验难以探究的潜在机制。直到最近,用于长期控制动脉血压的唯一数学模型是盖顿和科尔曼模型;即G-C模型。该模型的核心假设是钠排泄由肾灌注压驱动,即所谓的“肾功能曲线”。因此,G-C模型认为所有形式的高血压都是由于肾功能曲线原发性地向更高的工作压力偏移所致。然而,最近在高盐摄入与给予血管紧张素II联合诱导的高血压模型(AngII-盐模型)中进行的几项实验研究与G-C模型不一致。我们开发了一种新的数学模型,该模型并不将盐敏感性高血压的病因仅仅局限于原发性肾功能障碍。该模型是第一个已知的与“所有盐敏感性高血压形式都需要肾功能原发性偏移”这一假设相悖的数学反例:我们证明,至少在一种盐敏感性高血压形式中,这种要求并非必要。我们将把这个计算模型称为“神经源性模型”。在本专题综述中,我们讨论了尽管G-C模型和神经源性模型在调节钠排泄和血管阻力的机制方面存在根本差异,但它们却产生了相似的AngII-盐高血压血流动力学特征。此外,在这两个模型中,动脉血压与钠排泄之间的稳态关系(一种常被错误地表述为“肾功能曲线”的相关性)也相似。我们的研究结果表明,盐敏感性高血压并非如G-C模型所预测的那样仅仅是由于肾功能障碍,也可能是由神经源性功能障碍导致的。