O'Kane G M, Cadoo K A, Walsh E M, Emerson R, Dervan P, O'Keane C, Hurson B, O'Toole G, Dudeney S, Kavanagh E, Eustace S, Carney D N
Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Gynaecologic Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, 300 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065 USA.
Clin Sarcoma Res. 2015 Jul 14;5:17. doi: 10.1186/s13569-015-0032-0. eCollection 2015.
Chemotherapy in the multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma has improved survival. Reported outcomes on adult patients are limited. Poor necrosis rates post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered an adverse prognostic factor and attempts have been made to improve survival in this group.
Adult and young adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma between January 1986 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients identified were stratified according to stage (localised or metastatic) and age (≤40 and >40 years). Event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were determined. In patients with localised disease ≤40 years, survival was assessed according to necrosis rates post NAC (<90 and ≥90%). NAC consisted of two cycles of methotrexate alternating with doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) followed by definitive surgery. Those with ≥90% tumour necrosis continued on MAP. Patients with <90% necrosis received ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) post operatively.
A total of 108 patients were reviewed and 97 were included. Median age was 23 years (range 16-75) and 70% of patients were male. Five year EFS and OS across all groups was 57% and 63% respectively. Of the patients with localised disease (N = 81), 5-year overall survival (OS), with a median follow up of 7 years (2-26) was 70% (p < 0.0001). Patients aged 16-40 (N = 68) with localised osteosarcoma had a significantly improved 5-year OS (74%) compared to those >40 years (N = 13) (42%) (p = 0.004). Of the 68 patients with localised osteosarcoma ≤40 years, 62 were evaluated according to necrosis rates post MAP. In 33 patients who achieved ≥90% necrosis and continued MAP, 5-year OS was 82%. In 29 patients who had <90% tumour necrosis and received adjuvant IE, 5-year OS was 68% (p = 0.15). Multivariate analysis confirmed age and stage as prognostic factors but not poor necrosis rates in our treated population.
Long-term survival outcomes in a predominantly adult Irish population are similar to large reported trials. Age and stage at diagnosis are prognostic. Postoperative ifosfamide/etoposide alone in patients with poor necrosis rates is a feasible regimen, but its role in the adjuvant setting remains uncertain.
骨肉瘤多模式治疗中的化疗提高了生存率。关于成年患者的报道结果有限。新辅助化疗(NAC)后坏死率低被认为是一个不良预后因素,人们已尝试改善该组患者的生存率。
对1986年1月至2012年8月间诊断为骨肉瘤的成年和青年成年患者进行回顾性研究。确定的患者根据分期(局限性或转移性)和年龄(≤40岁和>40岁)进行分层。确定无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)结果。在年龄≤40岁的局限性疾病患者中,根据NAC后的坏死率(<90%和≥90%)评估生存率。NAC包括两个周期的甲氨蝶呤与阿霉素/顺铂交替(MAP),随后进行确定性手术。肿瘤坏死率≥90%的患者继续接受MAP治疗。坏死率<90%的患者术后接受异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(IE)治疗。
共回顾了108例患者,纳入97例。中位年龄为23岁(范围16 - 75岁),70%的患者为男性。所有组的5年EFS和OS分别为57%和63%。在局限性疾病患者(N = 81)中,中位随访7年(2 - 26年)的5年总生存率(OS)为70%(p < 0.0001)。年龄在16 - 40岁(N = 68)的局限性骨肉瘤患者的5年OS(74%)明显高于年龄>40岁(N = 13)的患者(42%)(p = 0.004)。在68例年龄≤40岁的局限性骨肉瘤患者中,62例根据MAP后的坏死率进行评估。在33例坏死率≥90%并继续接受MAP治疗的患者中,5年OS为82%。在29例肿瘤坏死率<90%并接受辅助IE治疗的患者中,5年OS为68%(p = 0.15)。多因素分析证实年龄和分期是预后因素,但在我们的治疗人群中,坏死率低不是预后因素。
在以成年为主的爱尔兰人群中的长期生存结果与大型报道试验相似。诊断时的年龄和分期是预后因素。坏死率低的患者单独术后使用异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷是一种可行的方案,但其在辅助治疗中的作用仍不确定。