Suppr超能文献

年龄作为骨肉瘤患者的预后因素:对 438 例患者的分析。

Age as a prognostic factor for patients with osteosarcoma: an analysis of 438 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr;136(4):561-70. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0690-5. Epub 2009 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether age at diagnosis is an important prognostic factor in patients with osteosarcoma. Understanding this relationship could yield valuable insight into therapeutic rationale, focus patient selection for clinical trials, advance molecular concepts and theories, and expand current principles guiding prognosis. Our aim was to understand if age at diagnosis is a prognostic indicator for eventual outcome, as measured by disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of 438 patients of all ages who were diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 2000 and who underwent the majority of their treatment at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Patient and tumor specific variables were collected including patient demographics, patient history, primary tumor information (i.e., location, size, histology, extension, necrosis, etc.), treatment strategy (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy), metastatic disease information, long-term follow-up, and eventual outcome. Statistical analyses, including univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, with overall survival and disease-free survival as the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 18.1 years (range 2 months to 78.8 years). Median follow-up was 4.2 years (range 5 days to 22.8 years) for all patients and 12.3 years (range 1 month to 22.8 years) for 209 surviving patients. Survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 54.1, 47.2, and 45.2%, respectively. On univariate analyses, age >or= 40 was found to be a poor prognostic factor. Other prognostic factors included tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis, soft-tissue tumor extension, surgery type, chemotherapy group, and tumor necrosis. Age was not identified a statistically significant prognostic variable on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Age at diagnosis does not appear to be a significant independent prognostic variable for overall survival or disease-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Although our data indicate that patients in the fifth decade and older fare worse than younger patients, other variables such as tumor necrosis, tumor extension, and tumor location are likely responsible for the observed decline in overall survival and disease-free survival.

摘要

背景

骨肿瘤患者的诊断年龄是否为重要的预后因素尚不清楚。了解这种关系可以为治疗原理提供有价值的见解,有助于为临床试验选择合适的患者,推进分子概念和理论,并扩展目前指导预后的原则。我们的目的是了解诊断年龄是否是骨肿瘤患者无病生存率和总生存率的预后指标。

方法

我们的队列包括 438 名年龄在所有年龄段的患者,他们于 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2000 年 12 月 31 日期间被诊断患有骨肿瘤,并在 MD 安德森癌症中心(MDACC)接受了大部分治疗。收集了患者和肿瘤的具体变量,包括患者人口统计学、病史、原发肿瘤信息(即位置、大小、组织学、扩展、坏死等)、治疗策略(即手术、化疗和/或放疗)、转移性疾病信息、长期随访和最终结果。进行了统计分析,包括单变量和多变量分析,以总生存率和无病生存率作为主要结局指标。

结果

诊断时的中位年龄为 18.1 岁(范围 2 个月至 78.8 岁)。所有患者的中位随访时间为 4.2 年(范围 5 天至 22.8 年),209 例存活患者的中位随访时间为 12.3 年(范围 1 个月至 22.8 年)。5 年、10 年和 15 年的生存率分别为 54.1%、47.2%和 45.2%。单变量分析发现,年龄≥40 岁是预后不良的因素。其他预后因素包括肿瘤大小、诊断时的转移、软组织肿瘤的扩展、手术类型、化疗组和肿瘤坏死。年龄在多变量分析中未被确定为显著的独立预后变量。

结论

诊断年龄似乎不是骨肿瘤患者总生存率或无病生存率的显著独立预后因素。尽管我们的数据表明,50 岁及以上的患者比年轻患者预后更差,但其他变量,如肿瘤坏死、肿瘤扩展和肿瘤位置,可能是导致总生存率和无病生存率下降的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验