Cancer Prevention and Control, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick2Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):737-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1796.
Optimal chemotherapy dosing in obese patients remains uncertain, with variation in practice. Dose reduction strategies are often used to avoid chemotoxicity, but recent American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend full dose.
To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on chemotherapy dosing and of dose reduction on ovarian cancer survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) health care setting of patients with primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancers diagnosed from January 2000 through March 2013. Analyses focused on 806 patients receiving adjuvant first-line therapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel with curative intent.
Overall and ovarian cancer-specific mortality. Deaths were identified through the KPNC Mortality Linkage System, with median follow-up of 52.5 months. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated from proportional hazards regression, accounting for prognostic variables including age at diagnosis, race, stage, grade, histologic type, chemotoxic effects, comorbidities, cancer antigen 125 levels, and BMI at diagnosis.
The strongest predictor of dose reduction was a high BMI. Compared with normal-weight women, obese class III women received 38% and 45% lower doses in milligrams per kilogram of body weight of paclitaxel and carboplatin, respectively (P < .001 for each agent). They also received lower relative dose intensity (RDI) for each agent and the combined regimen, calculated as average RDI (ARDI). Mean ARDI was 73.7% for obese class III women and 88.2% for normal-weight women (P < .001). Lower ARDI (<70%) was associated with worse overall (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.10-2.37]) and ovarian cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.12-2.55]). Women who were obese at diagnosis appeared to have better survival. In multivariable-adjusted analyses considering joint effects by BMI and ARDI, compared with women with normal weight and no dose reduction, normal-weight women with dose reduction (ARDI < 85%) experienced worse survival (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.02-2.21]). For each BMI category, those with ARDI less than 85% had worse survival than those without dose reduction. The improved survival among obese women was no longer apparent with dose reduction.
Lower RDI was an independent predictor of ovarian cancer mortality. This finding was strongest among normal-weight women but seen at all levels of BMI. Our results suggest that body size should not be a major factor influencing dose reduction decisions in women with ovarian cancer.
肥胖患者的最佳化疗剂量仍不确定,且存在实践差异。为避免化疗毒性,常采用剂量减少策略,但近期美国临床肿瘤学会指南建议使用全剂量。
评估体重指数(BMI)对化疗剂量的影响,以及剂量减少对卵巢癌生存的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:在 Kaiser Permanente Northern California(KPNC)医疗保健环境中,对 2000 年 1 月至 2013 年 3 月期间诊断为原发性侵袭性上皮性卵巢癌的患者进行队列研究。分析集中于 806 例接受卡铂和紫杉醇辅助一线治疗的患者,治疗目的为治愈。
总生存和卵巢癌特异性生存。通过 KPNC 死亡率链接系统确定死亡,中位随访 52.5 个月。采用比例风险回归估计风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间,考虑预后变量包括诊断时的年龄、种族、分期、分级、组织学类型、化疗毒性作用、合并症、癌抗原 125 水平和诊断时的 BMI。
剂量减少的最强预测因素是高 BMI。与体重正常的女性相比,肥胖 III 级女性接受的紫杉醇和卡铂的每公斤体重毫克剂量分别低 38%和 45%(每种药物均 P<0.001)。她们还接受了每种药物和联合方案的较低相对剂量强度(RDI),计算为平均 RDI(ARDI)。肥胖 III 级女性的平均 ARDI 为 73.7%,体重正常的女性为 88.2%(P<0.001)。较低的 ARDI(<70%)与总体生存(HR,1.62[95%CI,1.10-2.37])和卵巢癌特异性生存(HR,1.69[95%CI,1.12-2.55])恶化相关。诊断时肥胖的女性似乎具有更好的生存。在考虑 BMI 和 ARDI 联合效应的多变量调整分析中,与体重正常且未剂量减少的女性相比,体重正常但剂量减少(ARDI<85%)的女性生存更差(HR,1.50[95%CI,1.02-2.21])。对于每个 BMI 类别,ARDI 低于 85%的患者比未进行剂量减少的患者生存更差。肥胖女性的生存改善在剂量减少后不再明显。
较低的 RDI 是卵巢癌死亡率的独立预测因素。这一发现最强见于体重正常的女性,但在所有 BMI 水平均可见。我们的研究结果表明,在卵巢癌患者中,体型不应成为影响剂量减少决策的主要因素。