Maron Barry J, Casey Susan A, Chan Raymond H, Garberich Ross F, Rowin Ethan J, Maron Martin S
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;116(5):757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.047. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Risk stratification for sudden death (SD) is an essential component of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) management, given the proven effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for preventing SD. Although highly effective in identifying high-risk patients, current stratification algorithms remain incomplete and novel strategies are encouraged. In this regard, reliability of the statistical model to predict SD risk in HC, as recommended by the recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, was retrospectively tested in an independent cohort of 1,629 consecutive patients with HC aged ≥16 years. Of the 1,629 patients, 35 incurred SD events, but only 4 of these (11%) had high predictive risk scores >6%/5 years consistent with an ICD recommendation, and most (60%; n = 21) had scores <4%/5 years that would not justify ICDs. Of 46 high-risk patients with appropriate ICD interventions for ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, 27 (59%) had low SD risk scores of <4%/5 years, regarded by ESC as insufficient to recommend ICDs, and only 12 (26%) had scores >6%/5 years, considered an ICD indication; 11 of these 12 had already met conventional criteria warranting implantation with 2 to 3 risk markers. Of 414 patients with ICDs but without appropriate interventions, 258 (62%) had low risk scores (<4%/5 years) that would argue against implant. In conclusion, primary risk stratification using the ESC prognostic score applied retrospectively to a large independent HC cohort proved unreliable for prediction of future SD events. Most patients with HC with SD or appropriate ICD interventions were misclassified with low risk scores and therefore would have remained unprotected from arrhythmic SD without ICDs.
鉴于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在预防心源性猝死(SD)方面已被证实有效,因此SD的风险分层是肥厚型心肌病(HC)管理的重要组成部分。尽管当前的分层算法在识别高危患者方面非常有效,但仍不完整,故鼓励采用新的策略。在这方面,我们对1629例年龄≥16岁的连续性HC患者组成的独立队列进行了回顾性测试,以检验近期欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南推荐的预测HC患者SD风险的统计模型的可靠性。在这1629例患者中,有35例发生了SD事件,但其中只有4例(11%)的预测风险评分>6%/5年,符合ICD植入推荐,而大多数(60%;n = 21)的评分<4%/5年,不适合植入ICD。在46例因室颤/室速接受了适当ICD干预的高危患者中,27例(59%)的SD风险评分<4%/5年,ESC认为该评分不足以推荐植入ICD,只有12例(26%)的评分>6%/5年,被视为ICD植入指征;这12例中的11例已经符合植入2至3个风险标志物的传统标准。在414例植入了ICD但未接受适当干预的患者中,258例(62%)的风险评分较低(<4%/5年),这表明不适合植入。总之,将ESC预后评分应用于一个大型独立HC队列进行回顾性分析,结果表明该评分在预测未来SD事件方面不可靠。大多数发生SD或接受了适当ICD干预的HC患者被错误分类为低风险评分,因此如果不植入ICD,他们将无法预防心律失常性SD。