Salmon David P, Heindel William C, Hamilton Joanne M, Vincent Filoteo J, Cidambi Varun, Hansen Lawrence A, Masliah Eliezer, Galasko Douglas
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Evidence from patients with amnesia suggests that recognition memory span tasks engage both long-term memory (i.e., secondary memory) processes mediated by the diencephalic-medial temporal lobe memory system and working memory processes mediated by fronto-striatal systems. Thus, the recognition memory span task may be particularly effective for detecting memory deficits in disorders that disrupt both memory systems. The presence of unique pathology in fronto-striatal circuits in Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) compared to AD suggests that performance on the recognition memory span task might be differentially affected in the two disorders even though they have quantitatively similar deficits in secondary memory. In the present study, patients with autopsy-confirmed DLB or AD, and Normal Control (NC) participants, were tested on separate recognition memory span tasks that required them to retain increasing amounts of verbal, spatial, or visual object (i.e., faces) information across trials. Results showed that recognition memory spans for verbal and spatial stimuli, but not face stimuli, were lower in patients with DLB than in those with AD, and more impaired relative to NC performance. This was despite similar deficits in the two patient groups on independent measures of secondary memory such as the total number of words recalled from long-term storage on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test. The disproportionate vulnerability of recognition memory span task performance in DLB compared to AD may be due to greater fronto-striatal involvement in DLB and a corresponding decrement in cooperative interaction between working memory and secondary memory processes. Assessment of recognition memory span may contribute to the ability to distinguish between DLB and AD relatively early in the course of disease.
失忆症患者的证据表明,识别记忆广度任务涉及由间脑 - 内侧颞叶记忆系统介导的长期记忆(即次级记忆)过程和由额叶 - 纹状体系统介导的工作记忆过程。因此,识别记忆广度任务对于检测破坏这两个记忆系统的疾病中的记忆缺陷可能特别有效。与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相比,路易体痴呆(DLB)的额叶 - 纹状体回路中存在独特的病理学特征,这表明即使这两种疾病在次级记忆方面存在数量上相似的缺陷,但识别记忆广度任务的表现可能在这两种疾病中受到不同的影响。在本研究中,对经尸检确诊的DLB或AD患者以及正常对照(NC)参与者进行了单独的识别记忆广度任务测试,这些任务要求他们在多次试验中保留越来越多的言语、空间或视觉对象(即面孔)信息。结果显示,DLB患者的言语和空间刺激的识别记忆广度低于AD患者,且相对于NC参与者的表现受损更严重,而面孔刺激的识别记忆广度则不然。尽管两组患者在次级记忆的独立测量指标上存在相似的缺陷,例如在Buschke选择性提醒测试中从长期存储中回忆出的单词总数。与AD相比,DLB中识别记忆广度任务表现的不成比例的易损性可能是由于DLB中额叶 - 纹状体的参与程度更高,以及工作记忆和次级记忆过程之间的合作互动相应减少。评估识别记忆广度可能有助于在疾病过程中相对早期区分DLB和AD。