Kryvenko Oleksandr N, Epstein Jonathan I, Meier Frederick A, Gupta Nilesh S, Menon Mani, Diaz Mireya
From the Departments of Pathology and Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL; Department of Pathology and
Departments of Pathology, Urology, and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; and.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Aug;144(2):271-7. doi: 10.1309/AJCPQL9MKQ6VDDWL.
Prostate cancer screening algorithms and preoperative nomograms do not include patients' body mass index (BMI). We evaluated outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP) adjusted to BMI.
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, PSA mass, PSA density (PSAD), and RP findings were analyzed with respect to BMI in 4,926 men who underwent RP between 2005 and 2014.
In total, 1,001 (20.3%) men were normal weight, 2,547 (51.7%) were overweight, and 1,378 (28%) were obese. Median PSA levels (ng/mL) were normal weight, 5.0; overweight, 5.1; and obese, 5.2 (P = .094). Median PSA mass increased with increasing BMI: 15.9 vs 17.4 vs 19.4 μg (P < .001). Median PSAD was not significantly different: 0.11 vs 0.11 vs 0.11 ng/mL/g (P = .084). Median prostate weight increased with increasing BMI: 44 vs 45 vs 49 g (P < .001). Median prostatectomy tumor volume increased with increasing BMI: 3.9 vs 4.7 vs 5.9 cm(3) (P < .001). Overweight and obese patients had a higher Gleason score and more locally advanced cancer (P < .001). Frequency of positive surgical margins increased with higher BMIs (P < .001). Frequency of lymph node metastasis did not differ significantly (P = .088).
While BMI correlates with tumor volume, Gleason score, and extent of disease at RP, there is no routinely measured clinical parameter reflecting this. Only PSA mass highlights this correlation. Thus, BMI and potentially PSA mass should be taken into account in predictive algorithms pertaining to prostate cancer and its surgical treatment.
前列腺癌筛查算法和术前列线图未纳入患者的体重指数(BMI)。我们评估了根据BMI调整后的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的结果。
对2005年至2014年间接受RP的4926名男性,分析其血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、PSA总量、PSA密度(PSAD)以及RP结果与BMI的关系。
总体而言,1001名(20.3%)男性体重正常,2547名(51.7%)超重,1378名(28%)肥胖。PSA水平中位数(ng/mL)分别为:体重正常者5.0,超重者5.1,肥胖者5.2(P = 0.094)。PSA总量中位数随BMI增加而升高:15.9 vs 17.4 vs 19.4 μg(P < 0.001)。PSAD中位数无显著差异:0.11 vs 0.11 vs 0.11 ng/mL/g(P = 0.084)。前列腺重量中位数随BMI增加而升高:44 vs 45 vs 49 g(P < 0.001)。前列腺切除标本肿瘤体积中位数随BMI增加而升高:3.9 vs 4.7 vs 5.9 cm³(P < 0.001)。超重和肥胖患者的Gleason评分更高,局部进展期癌症更多(P < 0.001)。手术切缘阳性率随BMI升高而增加(P < 0.001)。淋巴结转移率无显著差异(P = 0.088)。
虽然BMI与RP时的肿瘤体积、Gleason评分及疾病范围相关,但尚无常规测量的临床参数能反映这一点。只有PSA总量突出了这种相关性。因此,在前列腺癌及其手术治疗的预测算法中应考虑BMI以及可能的PSA总量。