Panzeri Francesca, Crippa Stefano, Castelli Paola, Aleotti Francesca, Pucci Alessandro, Partelli Stefano, Zamboni Giuseppe, Falconi Massimo
Francesca Panzeri, Department of Surgery, Ospedale "Mater Salutis", 37045 Legnago, Italy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):7970-87. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7970.
Ampullary neoplasms, although rare, present distinctive clinical and pathological features from other neoplastic lesions of the periampullary region. No specific guidelines about their management are available, and they are often assimilated either to biliary tract or to pancreatic carcinomas. Due to their location, they tend to become symptomatic at an earlier stage compared to pancreatic malignancies. This behaviour results in a higher resectability rate at diagnosis. From a pathological point of view they arise in a zone of transition between two different epithelia, and, according to their origin, may be divided into pancreatobiliary or intestinal type. This classification has a substantial impact on prognosis. In most cases, pancreaticoduodenectomy represents the treatment of choice when there is an overt or highly suspicious malignant behaviour. The rate of potentially curative resection is as high as 90% and in high-volume centres an acceptable rate of complications is reported. In selected situations less invasive approaches, such as ampullectomy, have been advocated, although there are some concerns mainly because of a higher recurrence rate associated with limited resections for invasive carcinomas. Importantly, these methods have the drawback of not including an appropriate lymphadenectomy, while nodal involvement has been shown to be frequently present also in apparently low-risk carcinomas. Endoscopic ampullectomy is now the procedure of choice in case of low up to high-grade dysplasia providing a proper assessment of the T status by endoscopic ultrasound. In the present paper the evidence currently available is reviewed, with the aim of offering an updated framework for diagnosis and management of this specific type of disease.
壶腹肿瘤虽然罕见,但与壶腹周围区域的其他肿瘤性病变相比,具有独特的临床和病理特征。目前尚无关于其治疗的具体指南,它们常被归为胆管癌或胰腺癌。由于其位置,与胰腺恶性肿瘤相比,它们往往在更早阶段出现症状。这种情况导致诊断时的可切除率更高。从病理学角度来看,它们起源于两种不同上皮之间的过渡区域,根据其起源,可分为胰胆管型或肠型。这种分类对预后有重大影响。在大多数情况下,当存在明显或高度可疑的恶性行为时,胰十二指肠切除术是首选的治疗方法。潜在治愈性切除率高达90%,在大型中心,并发症发生率也在可接受范围内。在某些特定情况下,有人主张采用侵入性较小的方法,如壶腹切除术,尽管存在一些担忧,主要是因为侵袭性癌的有限切除术后复发率较高。重要的是,这些方法的缺点是不包括适当的淋巴结清扫,而淋巴结受累在明显低风险的癌症中也经常出现。对于低至高级别发育异常的情况,内镜下壶腹切除术现在是首选的手术方法,通过内镜超声对T分期进行适当评估。在本文中,对目前可用的证据进行了综述,目的是为这种特定类型疾病的诊断和治疗提供一个更新的框架。