Quality of life and outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy surgical treatment for duodenal papillary adenomas.

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgery for duodenal papillary adenomas (DPAs), which is traditionally associated with notable postoperative risks.

AIM

To compare quality of life (QoL) and outcomes between DPA patients undergoing EP surgical resection, and to assess the influencing factors of QoL and complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis involving patients treated for DPA at the Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from 2011 to 2023. The participants completed post-discharge telephone surveys using the 12-item short form survey to assess mental (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores, with norm-based scoring where ≥ 50 denotes normal. Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for confounding variables was used to compare QoL scores.

RESULTS

Compared with EP patients, surgically treated patients had significantly lower PCS [median: 53.0, interquartile range (IQR): 46.0-55.1 54.2, IQR: 51.7-55.9, = 0.008] and MCS scores (median: 48.6, IQR: 41.8-56.0 55.9, IQR: 51.7-60.7, < 0.001). These disparities persisted even after adjustments for demographic and medical factors. Long-term follow-up of the EP group revealed that abdominal pain and poor sleep were factors negatively impacting PCS scores, whereas postoperative pancreatitis and hypertension were associated with lower MCS scores.

CONCLUSION

EP has emerged as a QoL-preserving alternative for patients with DPA, conditional upon ensuring equivalent efficacy and safety. QoL outcomes should be considered when choosing interventions for this patient population.