Ben A, Tanaka T, Shiraiwa K, Kobayashi S, Kikuyama A, Magome A, Kawamura K, Yamaguchi C, Ehara T, Miyazawa K
Department of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University.
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Dec;35(12):2099-105.
In 1980, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was incorporated as a nonsurgical method of stone removal in the cases of nephrolithiasis and rapidly found worldwide acceptance. Several devices commonly designated "second generation" lithotripters vs "first generation" Dornier HM3 are now under experimental or clinical trial. We report our clinical experience of ESWL using a Siemens Lithostar and compared it with that obtained using a Dornier HM3. One hundred patients were treated during the period of April through October, 1986 using an HM3, and 100 other patients were treated using a Lithostar from April to August, 1988. More cases were treated with a Lithostar than with a HM3. Nearly 10% of all patients treated by ESWL required additional therapeutic approaches (excepted ureteral stent) either with HM3 or Lithostar. However, in the cases of ureteral stone, with the Lithostar more cases required adjuvant procedures (TUL) than HM3. Significantly more shock waves were needed with Lithostar than HM3 for complete fragmentation of the same size of renal and ureteral stones. The stone-free rate during a one month period after ESWL was nearly the same for HM3 and Lithostar (HM3: 84.3%, Lithostar: 83.5%). Lithostar is a multifunctional lithotriptor which has most of the advantages required by the lithotripter.
1980年,体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)作为一种治疗肾结石的非手术取石方法被引入,并迅速在全球得到认可。目前,几种通常被称为“第二代”的碎石机与“第一代”多尼尔HM3相比,正处于实验或临床试验阶段。我们报告了使用西门子Lithostar进行ESWL的临床经验,并将其与使用多尼尔HM3的经验进行了比较。1986年4月至10月期间,使用HM3治疗了100例患者,1988年4月至8月期间,使用Lithostar治疗了另外100例患者。使用Lithostar治疗的病例比使用HM3的多。接受ESWL治疗的所有患者中,近10%的患者需要使用HM3或Lithostar进行额外的治疗方法(不包括输尿管支架)。然而,在输尿管结石的病例中,与HM3相比,使用Lithostar需要辅助手术(输尿管镜取石术)的病例更多。对于相同大小的肾和输尿管结石,Lithostar比HM3需要更多的冲击波才能完全破碎。ESWL后一个月内的无石率,HM3和Lithostar几乎相同(HM3:84.3%,Lithostar:83.5%)。Lithostar是一种多功能碎石机,具备碎石机所需的大部分优点。