Kim Grace J, Rivera Lisa, Stein Joel
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
To investigate the feasibility of a combined clinic-home intervention using a robotic elbow brace and, secondarily, to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of this clinic-home intervention.
Nonrandomized pre-/postinterventional study.
Outpatient clinic and participants' homes.
Individuals at least 6 months after stroke (N=11; 5 women and 6 men; mean age, 51.7y; mean time since stroke, 7.6y; mean Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] score, 22 of 66) were enrolled from the community.
Participants received training in an outpatient clinic from an experienced occupational therapist to gain independence with use of the device (3-9 sessions) followed by a 6-week home program using the device at home.
Five instruments were administered before and after the study intervention: Modified Ashworth Scale, Box and Blocks test, FMA-UE, Arm Motor Ability Test, and Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use and Motor Activity Log-How Well subscales (MAL-AOU, MAL-HW).
Nine participants completed the study. Participants used the device on average 42.9min/d, 5.3d/wk. The FMA-UE (t=3.32; P=.01), MAL-AOU (t=4.40; P=.002), and MAL-HW (t=4.02; P=.004) scores showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to discharge; the MAL-AOU (t=2.61; P=.035) and MAL-HW (t=2.47; P=.043) scores were also significantly improved from baseline to 3-month follow-up.
This combined clinic-home intervention was feasible and effective. Participants demonstrated improvements in arm impairment and self-reported use of the arm from baseline to discharge; they continued to report significant improvement in actual use of the arm at 3-month follow-up.
研究使用机器人肘部支具进行门诊-家庭联合干预的可行性,并其次收集有关该门诊-家庭干预疗效的初步数据。
非随机干预前/后研究。
门诊和参与者家中。
从社区招募了中风后至少6个月的个体(N = 11;5名女性和6名男性;平均年龄51.7岁;中风后平均时间7.6年;上肢Fugl-Meyer评估[FMA-UE]平均得分,66分中的22分)。
参与者在门诊接受经验丰富的职业治疗师的培训,以独立使用该设备(3 - 9次疗程),随后在家中进行为期6周的使用该设备的家庭计划。
在研究干预前后使用了五种工具:改良Ashworth量表、箱块测试、FMA-UE、手臂运动能力测试以及运动活动日志-使用量和运动活动日志-使用效果分量表(MAL-AOU,MAL-HW)。
9名参与者完成了研究。参与者平均每天使用该设备42.9分钟,每周使用5.3天。从基线到出院,FMA-UE(t = 3.32;P = .01)、MAL-AOU(t = 4.40;P = .002)和MAL-HW(t = 4.02;P = .004)得分显示出统计学上的显著改善;从基线到3个月随访,MAL-AOU(t = 2.61;P = .035)和MAL-HW(t = 2.47;P = .043)得分也有显著改善。
这种门诊-家庭联合干预是可行且有效的。参与者从基线到出院时,手臂损伤和自我报告的手臂使用情况均有改善;在3个月随访时,他们继续报告手臂实际使用情况有显著改善。