Woody Andrea I
Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Box 353350, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2015 Aug;52:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 7.
Philosophy of science offers a rich lineage of analysis concerning the nature of scientific explanation, but the vast majority of this work, aiming to provide an analysis of the relation that binds a given explanans to its corresponding explanandum, presumes the proper analytic focus rests at the level of individual explanations. There are, however, other questions we could ask about explanation in science, such as: What role(s) does explanatory practice play in science? Shifting focus away from explanations, as achievements, toward explaining, as a coordinated activity of communities, the functional perspective aims to reveal how the practice of explanatory discourse functions within scientific communities given their more comprehensive aims and practices. In this paper, I outline the functional perspective, argue that taking the functional perspective can reveal important methodological roles for explanation in science, and consequently, that beginning here provides resources for developing more adequate responses to traditional concerns. In particular, through an examination of the ideal gas law, I emphasize the normative status of explanations within scientific communities and discuss how such status underwrites a compelling rationale for explanatory power as a theoretical virtue.
科学哲学提供了一系列关于科学解释本质的丰富分析,但这项工作的绝大多数旨在分析将给定解释项与其相应被解释项联系起来的关系,假定恰当的分析焦点在于个体解释层面。然而,关于科学中的解释我们还可以提出其他问题,比如:解释性实践在科学中扮演什么角色?功能视角将焦点从作为成果的解释转向作为社群协调活动的解释过程,旨在揭示在科学社群更广泛的目标和实践背景下,解释性话语实践是如何发挥作用的。在本文中,我概述了功能视角,认为采用该视角能够揭示解释在科学中所起的重要方法论作用,因此,从这里出发能为应对传统问题提供更充分的回应资源。特别是,通过对理想气体定律的考察,我强调了解释在科学社群中的规范地位,并讨论了这种地位如何为作为一种理论优点的解释力提供令人信服的基本原理。