• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗选择——来自Vital Heart Response注册研究的见解

Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry.

作者信息

Toleva Olga, Ibrahim Quazi, Brass Neil, Sookram Sunil, Welsh Robert

机构信息

University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada.

Royal Alexandra Hospital and CK Hui Heart Centre , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2015 Jun 24;2(1):e000235. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235
PMID:26196017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4488892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of elderly patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is challenging and they are under-represented in trials. Accordingly, we analysed reperfusion strategies and their effectiveness in patients with STEMI ≥75 years compared to <75 years within a comprehensive inclusive registry.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to hospital and tracked within a regional registry (2006-2011) were analysed comparing reperfusion strategy (primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), fibrinolysis and no reperfusion) between patients ≥75 vs <75 years old as well as across the reperfusion strategies in those ≥75 years.

RESULTS

There were 3588 patients with STEMI with 646 (18%) ≥75 years old. Elderly patients were more likely female (46.9% vs 18.4%) and had more prior: angina (28.2% vs 17.2%), myocardial infarction (MI; 22.8% vs 13.9%), hypertension (67.6% vs 44.2%), heart failure (2.3% vs 0.3%) and atrial fibrillation (2.2% vs 0.5%) (all p<0.001). The reperfusion strategy for patients ≥75 vs <75: PPCI 45.3% vs 41.2%, fibrinolysis 24.8% vs 45.7%, and no reperfusion 29.9% vs 13.1% (p<0.001). Time from symptoms to first medical contact (median, 93 vs 78 min p=0.008) and PPCI (median, 166 vs 136 min (p<0.001) were longer for ≥75 years. In those ≥75 years outcomes by reperfusion (PPCI, fibrinolysis and none) were: in-hospital death 13.3%, 9.4% and 19.7% (p=0.018), and composite of death, recurrent-MI, cardiogenic shock and congestive heart failure 28%, 20% and 33.2% (p=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have more comorbidities, worst in-hospital clinical outcomes and are less likely to receive reperfusion. Acknowledging physician selection of the reperfusion strategy; outcomes appear favourable in the elderly receiving fibrinolysis.

摘要

背景

老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的管理具有挑战性,且他们在试验中的代表性不足。因此,我们在一个全面的包容性登记系统中,分析了年龄≥75岁与<75岁的STEMI患者的再灌注策略及其有效性。

方法

分析2006 - 2011年期间在区域登记系统中连续入院并被追踪的STEMI患者,比较年龄≥75岁与<75岁患者的再灌注策略(直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)、溶栓治疗和未进行再灌注治疗),以及年龄≥75岁患者不同再灌注策略的情况。

结果

共有3588例STEMI患者,其中646例(18%)年龄≥75岁。老年患者女性比例更高(46.9%对18.4%),既往有更多的心绞痛(28.2%对17.2%)、心肌梗死(MI;22.8%对13.9%)、高血压(67.6%对44.2%)、心力衰竭(2.3%对0.3%)和心房颤动(2.2%对0.5%)(所有p<0.001)。年龄≥75岁与<75岁患者的再灌注策略:PPCI分别为45.3%对41.2%,溶栓治疗分别为24.8%对45.7%,未进行再灌注治疗分别为29.9%对13.1%(p<0.001)。年龄≥75岁患者从症状出现到首次医疗接触的时间(中位数,93分钟对78分钟,p = 0.008)和PPCI时间(中位数,166分钟对136分钟,p<0.001)更长。在年龄≥75岁的患者中,不同再灌注治疗(PPCI、溶栓治疗和未治疗)的结果如下:住院死亡率分别为13.3%、9.4%和19.7%(p = 0.018),死亡、再发心肌梗死、心源性休克和充血性心力衰竭的复合发生率分别为28%、20%和33.2%(p = 0.022)。

结论

老年患者合并症更多,住院临床结局更差,接受再灌注治疗的可能性更小。考虑到医生对再灌注策略的选择;老年患者接受溶栓治疗的结局似乎较好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fb/4488892/84e843e62058/openhrt2014000235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fb/4488892/84e843e62058/openhrt2014000235f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54fb/4488892/84e843e62058/openhrt2014000235f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment choices in elderly patients with ST: elevation myocardial infarction-insights from the Vital Heart Response registry.老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗选择——来自Vital Heart Response注册研究的见解
Open Heart. 2015 Jun 24;2(1):e000235. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000235. eCollection 2015.
2
Characteristics, Process Metrics, and Outcomes Among Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Rural vs Urban Areas in the US: A Report From the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry.美国农村与城市地区 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的特征、流程指标和结局:来自美国国家心血管数据登记的报告。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1016-1024. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2774.
3
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice: Insights From the Vital Heart Response Registry.临床实践中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的药物侵入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自 Vital Heart Response 注册研究的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008059. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
4
Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL-REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi-center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis-transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.OPTIMAL-REPERFUSION 试验的原理和设计:一项前瞻性随机多中心临床试验,比较急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中不同溶栓-经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):455-462. doi: 10.1002/clc.23582. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Association between timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注治疗时机与临床结局的相关性。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2148-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.712.
6
Fibrinolysis use among patients requiring interhospital transfer for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care: a report from the US National Cardiovascular Data Registry.接受 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的患者在院间转移中使用纤溶治疗的情况:来自美国国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):207-15. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6573.
7
Outcome up to one year following different reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Helsinki-Uusimaa Hospital District registry of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction (HUS-STEMI).不同再灌注策略对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 1 年预后的影响:赫尔辛基-乌西玛地区 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死登记研究(HUS-STEMI)。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Dec;2(4):371-8. doi: 10.1177/2048872613501985. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
8
Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后稳定初期不良事件的发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025572. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025572. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
Prognostic impact of non-compliance with guidelines-recommended times to reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The FAST-MI 2010 registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中未遵循指南推荐的再灌注治疗时间的预后影响。FAST-MI 2010注册研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Feb;6(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/2048872615610893. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Temporal Trends in Care and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Fibrinolytic Therapy Compared to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Get With The Guidelines Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) Registry.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,接受纤维蛋白溶解疗法患者的治疗及预后的时间趋势:来自“遵循指南-冠心病(GWTG-CAD)注册研究”的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 6;5(10):e004113. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004113.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Cohort Study.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的临床特征与结局:一项观察性队列研究
Glob Heart. 2024 Dec 30;19(1):99. doi: 10.5334/gh.1383. eCollection 2024.
2
An exploration of the early discharge approach for low-risk STEMI patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.对低风险ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期出院方法的探索。
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Apr 15;13(2):32-42. eCollection 2023.
3
Invasive versus Conservative Treatment Approach among Older Adult Patients Admitted with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating clinical reason and rationale for not delivering reperfusion therapy in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: Insights from a comprehensive cohort.评估ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者未进行再灌注治疗的临床原因及基本原理:来自一个综合队列的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;216:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.075. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
Temporal trends in the use of reperfusion therapy and outcomes in elderly patients with first ST elevation myocardial infarction.老年首次ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者再灌注治疗的使用情况及预后的时间趋势
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Oct;4(5):461-7. doi: 10.1177/2048872614565928. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
3
老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的侵入性与保守治疗方法对比
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022 Dec;26(4):347-353. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0079. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Sarcopenia-derived exosomal micro-RNA 16-5p disturbs cardio-repair via a pro-apoptotic mechanism in myocardial infarction in mice.肌少症衍生的外泌体 micro-RNA 16-5p 通过促进细胞凋亡的机制在小鼠心肌梗死后干扰心脏修复。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19163. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98761-8.
5
Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Patient.老年患者的急性冠状动脉综合征
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 14;10(18):4132. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184132.
6
Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.开发一种机器学习模型以预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者发生晚期心源性休克的风险。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1162. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2905.
7
Impact of thrombus aspiration in frail STEMI patients. frail STEMI 患者血栓抽吸的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Nov;33(11):3081-3089. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01848-5. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
8
Effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic strategies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死患者抗栓策略的有效性和安全性
World J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 26;12(11):513-525. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i11.513.
9
Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.心肌梗死后早期活动:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237866. eCollection 2020.
10
Benefit of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的获益
Open Heart. 2020 Aug;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001169.
Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in elderly (≥75 years) versus non-elderly (<75 years) patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the examination trial.
依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于≥75岁及<75岁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:EXAMINATION试验的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.038. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
4
Prognosis of elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 2001 to 2011: A report from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) registry.2001 年至 2011 年行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后:来自瑞典冠状动脉造影及血管成形术登记处(SCAAR)登记的报告。
Am Heart J. 2014 May;167(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients ≥75 years treated by the transradial approach.经桡动脉入路治疗≥75 岁患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 1;113(3):452-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
6
Bridging the gap for nonmetropolitan STEMI patients through implementation of a pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy.通过实施药物侵入性再灌注策略,为非大都市 STEMI 患者架起桥梁。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Aug;29(8):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
7
Contemporary clinical outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly versus younger patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年与年轻急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的当代临床结局比较。
J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Aug;24(4):357-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00634.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
8
The Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) study.心肌梗死后早期的策略性再灌注(STREAM)研究。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):30-35.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.007.
9
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.老年人急性冠脉护理,第二部分:ST段抬高型心肌梗死:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学理事会为医疗专业人员发表的科学声明:与老年心脏病学会合作制定
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2570-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182616.
10
Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: differences by age.老年人急性心肌梗死:年龄差异
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Sep;38(3):736-41. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01432-2.