Virk Mrigender, Sandler S Gerald
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Lab Med. 2015 Summer;46(3):190-4. doi: 10.1309/LMUNUP4FJTUX2GCD.
It is standard practice for pregnant RhD-negative women who have not already formed anti-D to receive antepartum Rh immunoprophylaxis and, if they deliver an RhD-positive neonate, to receive postpartum Rh immunoprophylaxis. An estimated 0.6% to 1.0% of white women have red blood cells that express a serologic weak D phenotype. Of these women, approximately 80% will have a weak D type 1, 2, or 3 that could be managed safely as RhD-positive. Surveys of laboratory practice reveal a lack of standards for interpreting the RhD type for women with a serologic weak D and for determining their need for Rh immunoprophylaxis. RhD genotyping is recommended to determine the molecular basis of serologic weak D phenotypes in pregnant women as a basis for determining their candidacy for Rh immunoprophylaxis.
对于尚未产生抗-D的RhD阴性孕妇,在产前接受Rh免疫预防,若分娩出RhD阳性新生儿,则在产后接受Rh免疫预防,这是标准做法。据估计,0.6%至1.0%的白人女性红细胞表达血清学弱D表型。在这些女性中,约80%会有1型、2型或3型弱D,可作为RhD阳性安全处理。实验室操作调查显示,对于血清学弱D女性的RhD类型解读以及确定她们是否需要Rh免疫预防,缺乏标准。建议进行RhD基因分型,以确定孕妇血清学弱D表型的分子基础,作为确定她们是否适合接受Rh免疫预防的依据。