Suppr超能文献

81 家输血服务机构的盲标本检测调查:产科和新生儿弱 D 表型 RBC 检测及 Rh 免疫球蛋白管理建议:经验教训

Obstetric and Newborn Weak D-Phenotype RBC Testing and Rh Immune Globulin Management Recommendations: Lessons From a Blinded Specimen-Testing Survey of 81 Transfusion Services.

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (Ramsey).

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Park).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Jan 1;147(1):71-78. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0250-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Modern RHD genotyping can be used to determine when patients with serologic weak D phenotypes have RHD gene variants at risk for anti-D alloimmunization. However, serologic testing, RhD interpretations, and laboratory management of these patients are quite variable.

OBJECTIVE.—: To obtain interlaboratory comparisons of serologic testing, RhD interpretations, Rh immune globulin (RhIG) management, fetomaternal hemorrhage testing, and RHD genotyping for weak D-reactive specimens.

DESIGN.—: We devised an educational exercise in which 81 transfusion services supporting obstetrics performed tube-method RhD typing on 2 unknown red blood cell challenge specimens identified as (1) maternal and (2) newborn. Both specimens were from the same weak D-reactive donor. The exercise revealed how participants responded to these different clinical situations.

RESULTS.—: Of reporting laboratories, 14% (11 of 80) obtained discrepant immediate-spin reactions on the 2 specimens. Nine different reporting terms were used to interpret weak D-reactive maternal RhD types to obstetricians. In laboratories obtaining negative maternal immediate-spin reactions, 28% (16 of 57) performed unwarranted antiglobulin testing, sometimes leading to recommendations against giving RhIG. To screen for excess fetomaternal hemorrhage after a weak D-reactive newborn, 47% (34 of 73) of reporting laboratories would have employed a contraindicated fetal rosette test, risking false-negative results and inadequate RhIG coverage. Sixty percent (44 of 73) of laboratories would obtain RHD genotyping in some or all cases.

CONCLUSIONS.—: For obstetric and neonatal patients with serologic weak D phenotypes, we found several critical problems in transfusion service laboratory practices. We provide recommendations for appropriate testing, consistent immunohematologic terminology, and RHD genotype-guided management of Rh immune globulin therapy and RBC transfusions.

摘要

背景

现代 RHD 基因分型可用于确定具有血清学弱 D 表型的患者是否存在 RHD 基因变异,从而导致抗-D 同种免疫。然而,这些患者的血清学检测、RhD 解释和实验室管理存在很大差异。

目的

比较不同实验室在血清学检测、RhD 解释、Rh 免疫球蛋白(RhIG)管理、胎儿母体出血检测和弱 D 反应性标本的 RHD 基因分型方面的差异。

设计

我们设计了一项教育性的实验,由 81 家支持产科的输血服务机构对 2 个未知的红细胞挑战标本进行试管法 RhD 定型,这 2 个标本分别被鉴定为(1)产妇和(2)新生儿。这两个标本均来自同一个弱 D 反应性供体。该实验揭示了参与者如何应对这些不同的临床情况。

结果

在报告实验室中,有 14%(11/80)对这 2 个标本的即时旋转反应不一致。9 种不同的报告术语被用于解释弱 D 反应性产妇 RhD 类型,以供产科医生参考。在获得阴性产妇即时旋转反应的实验室中,有 28%(16/57)进行了不必要的抗球蛋白检测,有时会导致不建议使用 RhIG。为了筛查弱 D 反应性新生儿后的胎儿母体出血过多,47%(34/73)的报告实验室会使用一种禁忌的胎儿玫瑰花结试验,这可能导致假阴性结果和 RhIG 覆盖不足。60%(44/73)的实验室会在某些或所有情况下进行 RHD 基因分型。

结论

对于具有血清学弱 D 表型的产科和新生儿患者,我们发现输血服务实验室实践中存在几个关键问题。我们提供了适当检测、一致的免疫血液学术语以及基于 RHD 基因型指导的 RhIG 治疗和 RBC 输血管理的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验