Taylor Nicholas J, Nikolaishvili-Feinberg Nana, Midkiff Bentley R, Conway Kathleen, Millikan Robert C, Geradts Joseph
*Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL †Translational Pathology Laboratory, School of Medicine ‡Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center §Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill ∥Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016 Jul;24(6):398-404. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000207.
Missense mutations in TP53 are common in human breast cancer, have been associated with worse prognosis, and may predict therapy effect. TP53 missense mutations are associated with aberrant accumulation of p53 protein in tumor cell nuclei. Previous studies have used relatively arbitrary cutoffs to characterize breast tumors as positive for p53 staining by immunohistochemical assays. This study aimed to objectively determine optimal thresholds for p53 positivity by manual and automated scoring methods using whole tissue sections from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. p53-immunostained slides were available for 564 breast tumors previously assayed for TP53 mutations. Average nuclear p53 staining intensity was manually scored as negative, borderline, weak, moderate, or strong and percentage of positive tumor cells was estimated. Automated p53 signal intensity was measured using the Aperio nuclear v9 algorithm combined with the Genie histology pattern recognition tool and tuned to achieve optimal nuclear segmentation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine optimal cutoffs for average staining intensity and percent cells positive to distinguish between tumors with and without a missense mutation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated a threshold of moderate average nuclear staining intensity as a good surrogate for TP53 missense mutations in both manual (area under the curve=0.87) and automated (area under the curve=0.84) scoring systems. Both manual and automated immunohistochemical scoring methods predicted missense mutations in breast carcinomas with high accuracy. Validation of the automated intensity scoring threshold suggests a role for such algorithms in detecting TP53 missense mutations in high throughput studies.
TP53基因的错义突变在人类乳腺癌中很常见,与较差的预后相关,并且可能预测治疗效果。TP53错义突变与肿瘤细胞核中p53蛋白的异常积累有关。以往的研究使用相对任意的阈值,通过免疫组织化学检测将乳腺肿瘤表征为p53染色阳性。本研究旨在通过手动和自动评分方法,使用卡罗来纳乳腺癌研究中的全组织切片,客观地确定p53阳性的最佳阈值。有564例先前检测过TP53突变的乳腺肿瘤的p53免疫染色玻片。手动将细胞核p53染色强度评为阴性、临界、弱、中度或强,并估计阳性肿瘤细胞的百分比。使用Aperio细胞核v9算法结合Genie组织学模式识别工具测量自动p53信号强度,并进行调整以实现最佳的细胞核分割。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,以确定平均染色强度和阳性细胞百分比的最佳阈值,以区分有错义突变和无错义突变的肿瘤。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,在手动(曲线下面积=0.87)和自动(曲线下面积=0.84)评分系统中,中等平均细胞核染色强度阈值是TP53错义突变的良好替代指标。手动和自动免疫组织化学评分方法都能高精度地预测乳腺癌中的错义突变。自动强度评分阈值的验证表明,此类算法在高通量研究中检测TP53错义突变方面具有作用。