Pinto Cristiane Franco, Berger Sandrine Bittencourt, Cavalli Vanessa, Da Cruz Sérgio Eduardo Braga, Gonçalves Reginaldo Bruno, Ambrosano Glaucia Maria Bovi, Giannini Marcelo
Am J Dent. 2015 Jun;28(3):167-73.
To evaluate the in situ effect of fluoride and MDPB-containing adhesives on antibacterial activity around restorations in conditions of high caries risk.
Bovine enamel and dentin blocks were restored with a fluoride-containing (One-up Bond F Plus - OP) or a MDPB and fluoride-containing adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond - PB). Volunteers (n = 17) wore an intra-oral appliance containing three enamel and three dentin blocks, aligned side-by-side and restored with OP or PB and one enamel and dentin block (controls). The cariogenic challenge was carried out in two phases of 14 days each. The counts of total streptococci (TM), mutans streptococci (MS) and lactobacilli (LB) were analyzed in the biofilm formed. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSM) and polarized light microscopy (PLM) evaluated caries lesions around the restorations and the demineralization extension. Data obtained by CSM testing was analyzed by Split-Split Plot ANOVA (P < 0.05). PLM and microbiota results were analyzed by Wilcoxon test (P < 0.05).
TM and MS counts were highest for the OP enamel restorations, and these presented higher lesion depths than PB in both the enamel and dentin. The CSM in dentin was the lowest at 60 μm from the restoration wall. None of the adhesives prevented demineralization and bacteria growth, but PB reduced the amount of oral pathogens in enamel and demineralization around restorations in enamel and dentin.
评估含氟化物和含MDPB的粘结剂在高龋风险条件下对修复体周围抗菌活性的原位作用。
用含氟粘结剂(单组分粘结剂F Plus - OP)或含MDPB和氟化物的粘结剂(Clearfil Protect Bond - PB)对牛牙釉质和牙本质块进行修复。志愿者(n = 17)佩戴一个口腔内装置,其中包含三个并排排列的牙釉质和三个牙本质块,分别用OP或PB进行修复,还有一个牙釉质和牙本质块作为对照。致龋挑战分两个阶段进行,每个阶段14天。对形成的生物膜中的总链球菌(TM)、变形链球菌(MS)和乳酸菌(LB)进行计数分析。采用横断面显微硬度(CSM)和偏光显微镜(PLM)评估修复体周围的龋损情况及脱矿范围。通过CSM测试获得的数据采用裂区裂区方差分析(P < 0.05)。PLM和微生物群结果采用Wilcoxon检验(P < 0.05)进行分析。
OP牙釉质修复体的TM和MS计数最高,且其在牙釉质和牙本质中的病变深度均高于PB。距修复体壁60μm处牙本质的CSM最低。两种粘结剂均未能阻止脱矿和细菌生长,但PB减少了牙釉质中口腔病原体的数量以及牙釉质和牙本质修复体周围的脱矿情况。