Belda-Rustarazo S, Cantero-Hinojosa J, Salmeron-García A, González-García L, Cabeza-Barrera J, Galvez J
Hospital Pharmacy Service, Biohealth Research Institute of Granada, University Hospital Complex, Granada, Spain.
Internal Medicine Service, University Hospital Complex, Granada, Spain.
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1268-74. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12701. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Medication errors are frequent at care transition points and can have serious repercussions. Study objectives were to examine the frequency/type of reconciliation errors at hospital admission and discharge and to report on the drugs involved, associated risk factors and potential to cause harm in a healthcare setting with comprehensive digital health records.
A prospective observational 2-year study was conducted in the Internal Medicine Department of a regional hospital. The best possible medication history was obtained from different sources by clinical pharmacists and compared with prescriptions at admission and discharge. The frequency and type of reconciliation errors were studied at admission and discharge, evaluating risk factors for their occurrence and their potential to cause harm.
The study included 814 patients (mean age: 80.2 years). At least one reconciliation error was detected in 525 (64.5%) patients at admission, with a mean of 2.2 ± 1.3 errors per patient and in 235 (32.4%) patients at discharge. Drug omission was the most frequent reconciliation error (73.6% at admission and 71.4% at discharge); 39% of errors at admission and 51% at discharge had potential to cause moderate or severe harm. The risk of error at admission was higher with more pre-admission drugs (p < 0.001) and, among patients with reconciliation errors, the number of errors was significantly higher in those receiving more drugs pre-admission or with more comorbidities. The risk at discharge was higher in patients with more drugs prescribed at discharge (p = 0.04) and in those with a longer hospital stay (p = 0.03).
Medication reconciliation procedures are required to minimise medication discrepancies and enhance patient safety. Integration of patient health records across care levels is necessary but not sufficient to prevent errors.
用药错误在护理转接点很常见,可能会产生严重后果。研究目的是检查住院和出院时用药核对错误的频率/类型,并报告所涉及的药物、相关风险因素以及在拥有全面数字健康记录的医疗环境中造成伤害的可能性。
在一家地区医院的内科进行了一项为期2年的前瞻性观察研究。临床药师从不同来源获取尽可能完善的用药史,并与入院和出院时的处方进行比较。研究了入院和出院时用药核对错误的频率和类型,评估其发生的风险因素及其造成伤害的可能性。
该研究纳入了814名患者(平均年龄:80.2岁)。入院时,525名(64.5%)患者至少检测到一处用药核对错误,每位患者平均有2.2±1.3处错误;出院时,235名(32.4%)患者存在用药核对错误。漏服药物是最常见的用药核对错误(入院时为73.6%,出院时为71.4%);入院时39%的错误和出院时51%的错误有可能造成中度或重度伤害。入院前服用药物越多,入院时出现错误的风险越高(p<0.001),在存在用药核对错误的患者中,入院前服用药物较多或合并症较多的患者错误数量显著更高。出院时开具药物较多的患者(p=0.04)和住院时间较长的患者(p=0.03)出现错误的风险更高。
需要进行用药核对程序,以尽量减少用药差异并提高患者安全性。整合不同护理层面的患者健康记录是必要的,但不足以预防错误。