Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Pockelsstraße 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Climatology and Environmental Meteorology, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:150-160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.051. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
The microscale intra-urban variation of ultrafine particle concentrations (UFP, diameter Dp<100 nm) and particle number size distributions was studied by two statistical regression approaches. The models were applied to a 1 km2 study area in Braunschweig, Germany. A land use regression model (LUR) using different urban morphology parameters as input is compared to a multiple regression type model driven by pollutant and meteorological parameters (PDR). While the LUR model was trained with UFP concentration the PDR model was trained with measured particle number size distribution data. The UFP concentration was then calculated from the modelled size distributions. Both statistical approaches include explanatory variables that try to address the 'process chain' of particle emission, dilution and deposition. LUR explained 74% and 85% of the variance of UFP for the full data set with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 668 cm(-3) and 1639 cm(-3) in summer and winter, respectively. PDR explained 56% and 74% of the variance with RMSE of 4066 cm(-3) and 6030 cm(-3) in summer and winter, respectively. Both models are capable to depict the spatial variation of UFP across the study area and in different outdoor microenvironments. The deviation from measured UFP concentrations is smaller in the LUR model than in PDR. The PDR model is well suited to predict urban particle number size distributions from the explanatory variables (total particle number concentration, black carbon and wind speed). The urban morphology parameters in the LUR model are able to resolve size dependent concentration variations but not as adequately as PDR.
采用两种统计回归方法研究了超细颗粒浓度(UFP,直径 Dp<100nm)和颗粒数分布的微观城市内变异。模型应用于德国不莱梅的 1km2 研究区域。将使用不同城市形态参数作为输入的土地利用回归模型(LUR)与由污染物和气象参数驱动的多元回归模型(PDR)进行比较。虽然 LUR 模型是用 UFP 浓度进行训练的,但 PDR 模型是用测量的颗粒数分布数据进行训练的。然后从模拟的粒径分布计算 UFP 浓度。这两种统计方法都包含了试图解决颗粒排放、稀释和沉积“过程链”的解释变量。LUR 分别解释了夏季和冬季全数据集 UFP 方差的 74%和 85%,其均方根误差(RMSE)分别为 668cm(-3)和 1639cm(-3)。PDR 分别解释了 56%和 74%的方差,其 RMSE 分别为 4066cm(-3)和 6030cm(-3)。这两种模型都能够描绘研究区域和不同室外微环境中 UFP 的空间变化。LUR 模型中测量的 UFP 浓度的偏差小于 PDR 模型。PDR 模型非常适合根据解释变量(总颗粒数浓度、黑碳和风速)预测城市颗粒数分布。LUR 模型中的城市形态参数能够解析与尺寸相关的浓度变化,但不如 PDR 模型充分。