1 Thoracic Oncology Program, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, 5251 NE Glisan Ave, Bldg A, Portland, OR 97213-2967.
2 Fariborz Maseeh Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):278-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13945.
Lung cancer screening guidelines are based on the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that used chest radiographic control subjects on the premise of the reported mortality equivalence in chest radiography versus unscreened persons in the NLST-eligible subgroup of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. The purpose of this article is to discuss concerns regarding the validity of the NLST premise of chest radiography and null screening equivalence.
Anomalous findings combined with the failure of CT trials using unscreened control subjects to replicate the benefits of the NLST open to question the validity of this premise.
肺癌筛查指南基于国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST),该试验使用胸部 X 射线对照受试者,前提是 NLST 合格亚组的前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验中胸部 X 射线报告的死亡率与未筛查者相当。本文的目的是讨论对 NLST 胸部 X 射线前提和无效筛查等效性的有效性的担忧。
异常发现结合使用未经筛选对照受试者的 CT 试验未能复制 NLST 的获益,这使得该前提的有效性受到质疑。