Katki Hormuzd A, Kovalchik Stephanie A, Berg Christine D, Cheung Li C, Chaturvedi Anil K
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2300-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6255.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening for ever-smokers aged 55 to 80 years who have smoked at least 30 pack-years with no more than 15 years since quitting. However, selecting ever-smokers for screening using individualized lung cancer risk calculations may be more effective and efficient than current USPSTF recommendations.
Comparison of modeled outcomes from risk-based CT lung-screening strategies vs USPSTF recommendations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Empirical risk models for lung cancer incidence and death in the absence of CT screening using data on ever-smokers from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO; 1993-2009) control group. Covariates included age; education; sex; race; smoking intensity, duration, and quit-years; body mass index; family history of lung cancer; and self-reported emphysema. Model validation in the chest radiography groups of the PLCO and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; 2002-2009), with additional validation of the death model in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS; 1997-2001), a representative sample of the United States. Models were applied to US ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years (NHIS 2010-2012) to estimate outcomes of risk-based selection for CT lung screening, assuming screening for all ever-smokers, yield the percent changes in lung cancer detection and death observed in the NLST.
Annual CT lung screening for 3 years beginning at age 50 years.
For model validity: calibration (number of model-predicted cases divided by number of observed cases [estimated/observed]) and discrimination (area under curve [AUC]). For modeled screening outcomes: estimated number of screen-avertable lung cancer deaths and estimated screening effectiveness (number needed to screen [NNS] to prevent 1 lung cancer death).
Lung cancer incidence and death risk models were well calibrated in PLCO and NLST. The lung cancer death model calibrated and discriminated well for US ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years (NHIS 1997-2001: estimated/observed = 0.94 [95%CI, 0.84-1.05]; AUC, 0.78 [95%CI, 0.76-0.80]). Under USPSTF recommendations, the models estimated 9.0 million US ever-smokers would qualify for lung cancer screening and 46,488 (95% CI, 43,924-49,053) lung cancer deaths were estimated as screen-avertable over 5 years (estimated NNS, 194 [95% CI, 187-201]). In contrast, risk-based selection screening of the same number of ever-smokers (9.0 million) at highest 5-year lung cancer risk (≥1.9%) was estimated to avert 20% more deaths (55,717 [95% CI, 53,033-58,400]) and was estimated to reduce the estimated NNS by 17% (NNS, 162 [95% CI, 157-166]).
Among a cohort of US ever-smokers aged 50 to 80 years, application of a risk-based model for CT screening for lung cancer compared with a model based on USPSTF recommendations was estimated to be associated with a greater number of lung cancer deaths prevented over 5 years, along with a lower NNS to prevent 1 lung cancer death.
美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议对年龄在55至80岁之间、吸烟史至少达30包年且戒烟时间不超过15年的既往吸烟者进行计算机断层扫描(CT)肺癌筛查。然而,使用个体化肺癌风险计算来选择进行筛查的既往吸烟者可能比当前USPSTF的建议更有效且高效。
比较基于风险的CT肺癌筛查策略与USPSTF建议的模拟结果。
设计、设置和参与者:利用前列腺、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验(PLCO;1993 - 2009年)对照组中既往吸烟者的数据,建立在无CT筛查情况下肺癌发病率和死亡率的经验风险模型。协变量包括年龄、教育程度、性别、种族、吸烟强度、持续时间和戒烟年限、体重指数、肺癌家族史以及自我报告的肺气肿情况。在PLCO的胸部X线检查组和国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST;2002 - 2009年)中进行模型验证,并在美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS;1997 - 2001年)中对死亡模型进行额外验证,NHIS是美国的一个代表性样本。将模型应用于年龄在50至80岁的美国既往吸烟者(NHIS 2010 - 2012年),以估计基于风险的CT肺癌筛查选择的结果,假设对所有既往吸烟者进行筛查,得出在NLST中观察到的肺癌检测和死亡的百分比变化。
从50岁开始进行为期3年的年度CT肺癌筛查。
对于模型有效性:校准(模型预测病例数除以观察到的病例数[估计值/观察值])和区分度(曲线下面积[AUC])。对于模拟的筛查结果:估计可通过筛查避免的肺癌死亡人数以及估计的筛查有效性(预防1例肺癌死亡所需的筛查人数[NNS])。
肺癌发病率和死亡风险模型在PLCO和NLST中校准良好。肺癌死亡模型在年龄为50至80岁的美国既往吸烟者中校准和区分度良好(NHIS 1997 - 2001年:估计值/观察值 = 0.94[95%CI,0.84 - 1.05];AUC,0.78[95%CI,0.76 - 0.80])。根据USPSTF的建议,模型估计有900万美国既往吸烟者符合肺癌筛查条件,并且估计在5年内有46,488例(95%CI,43,924 - 49,053)肺癌死亡可通过筛查避免(估计NNS为194[95%CI,187 - 201])。相比之下,对相同数量(900万)的5年肺癌风险最高(≥1.9%)的既往吸烟者进行基于风险的选择筛查,估计可多避免20%的死亡(55,717例[95%CI,53,033 - 58,400]),并且估计将NNS降低17%(NNS为162[95%CI,157 - 166])。
在年龄为50至80岁的美国既往吸烟者队列中,与基于USPSTF建议的模型相比,应用基于风险的模型进行CT肺癌筛查估计在5年内可预防更多肺癌死亡,同时预防1例肺癌死亡所需的NNS更低。