Moore Lynne, Cisse Brahim, Batomen Kuimi Brice Lionel, Stelfox Henry T, Turgeon Alexis F, Lauzier François, Clément Julien, Bourgeois Gilles
Department of social and preventive medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHU de Québec - Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 25;15:285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0949-2.
Injury is second only to cardiovascular disease in terms of acute care costs in North America. One key to improving injury care efficiency is to generate knowledge on the determinants of resource use. Socio-economic status (SES) is a documented risk factor for injury severity and mortality but its impact on length of stay (LOS) for injury admissions is unknown. This study aimed to examine the relationship between SES and LOS following injury. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on adults discharged alive from any trauma center (2007-2012; 57 hospitals; 65,486 patients) in a Canadian integrated provincial trauma system. SES was determined using ecological indices of material and social deprivation. Mean differences in LOS adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, and injury severity were generated using multivariate linear regression.
Mean LOS was 13.5 days. Patients in the highest quintile of material/social deprivation had a mean LOS 0.5 days (95 % CI 0.1-0.9)/1.4 days (1.1-1.8) longer than those in the lowest quintile. Patients in the highest quintiles of both social and material deprivation had a mean LOS 2.6 days (1.8-3.5) longer than those in the lowest quintiles.
Results suggest that patients admitted for traumatic injury who suffer from high social and/or material deprivation have longer acute care LOS in a universal-access health care system. The reasons behind observed differences need to be further explored but may indicate that discharge planning should take patient SES into consideration.
在北美,就急性护理费用而言,损伤仅次于心血管疾病。提高损伤护理效率的一个关键是获取有关资源使用决定因素的知识。社会经济地位(SES)是已被证实的损伤严重程度和死亡率的风险因素,但其对损伤住院患者住院时间(LOS)的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨SES与损伤后LOS之间的关系。这项多中心回顾性队列研究基于加拿大省级综合创伤系统中从任何创伤中心存活出院的成年人(2007 - 2012年;57家医院;65486名患者)。SES使用物质和社会剥夺的生态指数来确定。通过多变量线性回归得出经年龄、性别、合并症和损伤严重程度调整后的LOS平均差异。
平均LOS为13.5天。处于物质/社会剥夺最高五分位数的患者的平均LOS比处于最低五分位数的患者长0.5天(95%可信区间0.1 - 0.9)/1.4天(1.1 - 1.8)。社会和物质剥夺均处于最高五分位数的患者的平均LOS比处于最低五分位数的患者长2.6天(1.8 - 3.5)。
结果表明,在全民可及的医疗保健系统中,遭受高度社会和/或物质剥夺的创伤性损伤住院患者的急性护理LOS更长。观察到的差异背后的原因需要进一步探究,但可能表明出院计划应考虑患者的SES。